Unemployment would be reduced in the short run.
9,938.20 * * * * * That would be correct only if banks charged simple interest as opposed to compound interest. Anyone believe that likely? The correct answer, when interest is compounded, is 7900*(1.043)6 = 10170.28
The analytical answer is 1130.34 but banks are not likely to round up when it comes to paying you money so I would say 1130.33
Yes, if under simple random sampling there are likely to be too few representatives from a certain subset of the population in which you might have an interest.
The probability of getting curly hair depends on whether your parents do or not. Hair genes are decided by the mother. So, if the mother has curly hair, more than likely the offspring will as well. If the father has curly hair and the mother does not, the probability is considerably lowered.
To satisfy the rational basis test, the government must demonstrate that a law or regulation is rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest. This means that there must be a plausible connection between the means chosen and the ends sought. The burden of proof is on the challenger to show that the law is not rationally related to any legitimate interest, making this test relatively deferential to the government. Essentially, as long as the law is not arbitrary or capricious, it is likely to be upheld.
Unemployment would be reduced in the short run.
lower interest rates.
buy securities on the open market.
If the Federal Reserve decided to increase the reserve requirement in banks, it is likely that banks would be targeted more often for robbery. This would be because there would be more money in every federally-insured bank.
The most likely effect of the Federal Reserve lowering the discount rate on overnight loans would be an increase in the money supply. an increase in the money supply
the federal reserve would try to lower nominal interest rate (monetary policy), not part of govt. The federal govt. would stimulate spending, either by lowering taxes or pumping money into the economy and spending more.
The headline indicates that the Federal Reserve has made a decision to decrease the money supply, which is likely to lead to a slowdown in economic activity. By reducing the money supply, the Fed aims to control inflation or stabilize the economy, but this can also result in higher interest rates and reduced consumer spending. The anticipated impact suggests that economic growth may slow as a consequence of these measures.
decreasing the national debt
Expansionary policies
"A" is the highest series letter for 1928 $50 Federal Reserve Notes. "K" is most likely the Federal Reserve District letter. The series letter, if any, on US bills is next to the date. Please see the question "What is the value of a 1928 US 50 dollar Federal Reserve Note?" for more information on values.
If the reserve rate were lowered, banks would be required to hold less money in reserve and could lend more to businesses and consumers. This increase in lending could stimulate economic activity by encouraging spending and investment. However, it could also lead to higher inflation if too much money enters the economy too quickly. Additionally, lower reserve requirements may increase the risk of bank failures if borrowers default on their loans.
Consumers will save more and spend less.