2 and 3/5 as a decimal is 2.6
Nine and three sevenths can be converted into 66 sevenths. Three and four fifths can be converted into 19 fifths. Then I'll convert both fractions into 35ths, so we have 330 35ths minus 133 35ths, so, we get 197 35ths, which simplified to five and 22 35ths.
The answer would be 36
six and three fifths
That would be three fifths of your sentence.
0.6
Three fifths (3/5) converted to decimal format is actually .6, so yes, .7 would be greater than 3/5 or .6.
2 and 3/5 as a decimal is 2.6
When voting, slaves would only count for three-fifths of a person.
Nine and three sevenths can be converted into 66 sevenths. Three and four fifths can be converted into 19 fifths. Then I'll convert both fractions into 35ths, so we have 330 35ths minus 133 35ths, so, we get 197 35ths, which simplified to five and 22 35ths.
It would still be a trapezoid or trapezium. Only each of its sides would be three-fifths the size of the original trapezium.
three fifths. it can be 6/10. if you put one half in those terms of multiplying by 10 it would be 5/10.
No, two fifths is smaller the three fourths. It would only be 8/20ths while three fourths would be 15/20ths.
The answer would be 36
minus three fifths
The Three-Fifths Compromise (during the Constitutional Convention in 1787).
Assuming that you mean "fifths", the answer is three fifths.