Roman numeral is used to mark valence. If an atom, or metal atom has only one valence, you can spare writing it
hfggfcgggf
It was a combination of civilisations. We use the Indo-Arabic system.
The Roman numeral system does not use the letter A.
it would equal 400 but it is the incorrect way of writing 400. the way of writing 400 is CD
It depends on what you are writing about. answered by a twelve year old
Roman numeral is used to mark valence. If an atom, or metal atom has only one valence, you can spare writing it
hfggfcgggf
It was a combination of civilisations. We use the Indo-Arabic system.
The Roman numeral for 1000 is M.
The Roman numeral system does not use the letter A.
it would equal 400 but it is the incorrect way of writing 400. the way of writing 400 is CD
It isn't.There are no Roman numerals in it.Fe = Iron (from Latin 'ferrum')O = OxygenH = Hydrogen3 = Arabic numeral.
XXLII is not a Roman numeral as it does not conforms to the rules of writing numerals. If it were a numeral you might suppose that it would represent... (20 less than 50) + 2 which is of course 32 but the correct Roman numeral for 32 is XXXII
If you think to 1 (one) the Roman numeral is I.
A Roman numeral can be considered invalid due to several reasons. These include using a repetition of the same numeral more than three times in succession (e.g., IIII instead of IV), writing a numeral in a descending order (e.g., XCX instead of C), or using a numeral that is not part of the standard Roman numeral system (e.g., A instead of I).
No, the Roman numeral for 4 is IV, not llll. The use of llll is a common mistake, but traditional Roman numeral representations on clocks and other time-related devices use IV instead of llll for the numeral 4.