A one-tailed test should be used only in a study in which an effect in the unexpected direction is functionally equivalent to no effect. It is not appropriate to use a one-tailed test simply because one is able to specify the expected direction of the effect prior to running the study. In medicine, for example, we typically expect that the new procedure will improve the cure rate, but a finding that it decreases the cure rate would still be important, since it would demonstrate a possible flaw in the underlying theory. For a given effect size, sample size, and alpha, a one-tailed test is more powerful than a two-tailed test (a one-tailed test with alpha set at .05 has approximately the same power as a two-tailed test with alpha set at .10). However, the number of tails should be set based on the substantive issue (will an effect in the reverse direction be meaningful).
valid.
By creating a strong inference, you can then put your ideas to the test. After close observation, you can then rule-out any incorrect guesses.
Scientists use the data from an experiment to evaluate the hypothesis and draw a valid conclusion.
what condition we will use wilcoxon sign test
Normal, but a IQ test for a 4 year old is not valid enough to have merit.
A test may be reliable but not valid. A test may not be valid but not reliable. For example, if I use a yard stick that is mislabeled to measure the distance from tee to hole in golf on different length holes, the results will be neither reliable nor valid. If you use the same stick to measure football fields that are the same length the result will reliable (repeatable, consistent) but not valid (wrong numbers of yards). There is no test that is unreliable (repeatable, consistent) and valid (measures what we are looking for).
In my view reliable test is always valid.
There is no such valid test, so I would definitely question it.
No
If you are testing a hypothesis, does the test have anything to do with the hypothesis. If I want to test something to do with gravity and I use a red object compared to a blue object that probably isn't valid.
Yes, it would be a valid test.
No
Reliable indicates that each time the experiment is conducted, the same results are obtained (accuracy). Valid indicates the experiment (or test) has controlled variables and used an appropriate method/model.
Yes sure. It is valid. It will shows the how fast you are thinking.
You will have to try it out. Go to the Lowes website and test it out. If you punch the code in and it is accepted then you will be able to use it.
Urine for a drug test should be between 90-100 degrees Fahrenheit to be considered valid.
LSAT, MCAT, so on