0
What else can I help you with?
What is Arriving at a general conclusion based on observations of specific examples?
It is faulty logical reasoning. For example,1^1 = 1*1 2^2 = 2*2 conclusion: n^n = n*n WRONG!
The process of arriving at a specific conclusion based on previously accepted general statements?
The process of reasoning that arrives at a conclusion based on previously accepted general statements is Deductive reasoning. Alternatively, Inductive reasoning is the process of reasoning that arrives at a conclusion via observation (think of hypothesis).
Difference between inductive and deductive reasoning?
inductive reasoning is self propagation and self establishedinductive reasoning starts with empirical observations of specific phenomena, then establishes a general rule to fit the observed facts.deductive reasoning starts with a general rule, then applies that rule to a specific instance.
What is the process of arriving at a specific conclusion based on previously accepted general statements called?
deductive reasoning
He process of arriving at a general conclusion based on the observation of specific examples is called reasoning?
This would be an hypothesis (an educated guess).
What is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations?
One type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations is called modus ponens. This form of reasoning involves affirming the antecedent to reach a valid conclusion.
A syllogism is a type of that draws a conclusion from two specific observations?
deductive reasoning
What is using general observations to draw specific conclusion known as?
Deductive reasoning
Using a pattern of specific observations to draw a general conclusion is known as?
inductive reasoning
What is inductive reasoning moves from what to what?
The use of a specific observation to reach a general conclusion. (APEX)
Which type of reasoning moves from specific facts on order to reach a conclusion?
This is the deductive reasoning (deduction).
How are deductive and inductive reasoning diffrent from another?
Deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations. Deductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion with certainty, while inductive reasoning aims to support a conclusion with probability.
An argument that starts from a more specific idea to reach a more general conclusion is known as .?
inductive-reasoning
What is deductive reasonings?
Deductive reasoning is when you base a conjecture on statements that are assumed to be true.general to specific
What is the difference between deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning starts with a general principle and applies it to a specific situation to reach a certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations and uses them to make a generalization or prediction.
What is an argument that starts from a specific idea to reach a genral conclusion?
An argument that starts from a specific idea to reach a general conclusion is known as inductive reasoning. In this type of reasoning, specific observations or data points are used to draw a broader conclusion that is considered probable, but not necessarily definitive. Inductive reasoning allows for the generalization of patterns or trends based on specific instances.
Does inductive reasoning involve applying a general rule to a specific situation?
No, inductive reasoning involves reaching a general conclusion based on specific observations or evidence. It moves from specific instances to a general principle, unlike deductive reasoning which applies a general rule to specific situations.
