Wiki User
∙ 15y agoanswer: likely
Wiki User
∙ 15y agoIt is faulty logical reasoning. For example,1^1 = 1*1 2^2 = 2*2 conclusion: n^n = n*n WRONG!
inductive reasoning is self propagation and self establishedinductive reasoning starts with empirical observations of specific phenomena, then establishes a general rule to fit the observed facts.deductive reasoning starts with a general rule, then applies that rule to a specific instance.
deductive reasoning
This would be an hypothesis (an educated guess).
Scientists use deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning when looking at problems. Deductive reasoning involves making specific conclusions based on general principles or theories. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations or theories based on specific observations or evidence. Both types of reasoning are important in forming hypotheses, making predictions, and drawing conclusions in scientific research.
One type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations is called modus ponens. This form of reasoning involves affirming the antecedent to reach a valid conclusion.
Deductive reasoning
deductive reasoning
inductive reasoning
The use of a specific observation to reach a general conclusion. (APEX)
Inductive reasoning moves from specific facts or observations to reach a general conclusion. It involves making inferences based on patterns or trends identified in the data.
Deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations. Deductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion with certainty, while inductive reasoning aims to support a conclusion with probability.
inductive-reasoning
Deductive reasoning is when you base a conjecture on statements that are assumed to be true.general to specific
An argument that starts from a specific idea to reach a general conclusion is known as inductive reasoning. In this type of reasoning, specific observations or data points are used to draw a broader conclusion that is considered probable, but not necessarily definitive. Inductive reasoning allows for the generalization of patterns or trends based on specific instances.
No, inductive reasoning involves reaching a general conclusion based on specific observations or evidence. It moves from specific instances to a general principle, unlike deductive reasoning which applies a general rule to specific situations.
specific ideas to argue for a general idea.