The lane that goes straight through without changing is the main lane. If you merge into that lane, you have to yield to the flow of traffic. That means if your lane ends, it is you that should yeild.
Whoever is backing up is at fault. No matter what the circumstances. Watchout!! Even if you are involved in a collision with an unlicensed driver who is driving recklessly, if you are backing up it will still be YOUR FAULT ! The question will answer itself if you didn't try to force the wording so much: Don't you think who is at fault "...when you back into the side of some one...." seems pretty clear?
There are no firm figures, only estimates. No one wants to admit using a cellphone while in a collision, it is only when they are actually observed by witnesses that it can be confirmed that they were using one.Add'l: In some instances attorneys, and insurance companies have subpoeaned the cellphone records of the 'driver at fault' to prove that they were on the phone at the time of the collision.
More self-checkout lanes.
It means to merge or meld two or more things together into one thing.
stop lines
Stellar Collision Theory: The coming together of two astronomical bodies (stars), which through the force of gravity, merge into one larger unit
I don't know about England, but, there should be a warning sign or arrows indicating that a lane is going to merge. Also, the person who is there first should have the right way.
Well, yes, it warns you that the lanes are going to merge soon into one road. If it wasn't there, drivers may not understand that they must adjust their speeds to safely merge, rather than assume other traffic must wait for them.
Whoever is backing up is at fault. No matter what the circumstances. Watchout!! Even if you are involved in a collision with an unlicensed driver who is driving recklessly, if you are backing up it will still be YOUR FAULT ! The question will answer itself if you didn't try to force the wording so much: Don't you think who is at fault "...when you back into the side of some one...." seems pretty clear?
Scientists believe that Los Angeles and San Francisco are destined to merge into one city. Due to the San Andres Fault, Los Angeles is continuing to move closer to San Francisco.
depends on if they changed lanes safely or not(used their turn signals and changed lanes when safe to do so ) If they did you are at fault , if not they are . ALLWAYS get a cop out on the scene of a traffic accident , get a report and request that they be cited(given a ticket ) if they illegally change lanes etc , that way you have placed the blame where it should be and had it verified by an independent party (the police) , which is a tough combo to beat in a claim or in court . Good luck
That depends on who was in the lane of travel, and who was in the merge lane. The merge lane is the one required to yield to the travel lane. If the vehicle in the merge lane failed to yield the right-of-way, that'll definitely be a factor. However, other factors may apply, as well. Motorists have a bad tendency to want to suddenly speed up and pass a merging vehicle when they see a turn signal. Excessive speed/reckless driving on the part of one or both drivers will play a factor in determining fault, as well. In short, one would have to know all the details of the situation you described in order to determine whose at fault.
Streams often merge with one another to become rivers.
Most likely it is the other person's fault. You were not moving and therefore cannot do anything to avoid the accident. The other party is the only one that could take any action to prohibit the collision.
No, you cannot merge multiple questions at once. You can only merge multiple alternates at one time.
The police will have to decide on this one because it depends how close you were when car #2 made the U-turn. If it was far enough away then both of you would be at fault. Car #1 would be at fault for "undue care and attention" and Car #2 would be at fault for making an illegal u-turn. Car 2 is at fault from enroachment into the left lane. He has not only the obligation to yield to traffic in the lane with which he wants to merge, but also the responsibility to yield to oncoming traffic. In most states, he also can't change multiple lanes at a time. Car 2 is clearly at fault.
This did happen to me and I was the exiting the parking lot. I had already crossed one lane of traffic and was hit on the driver's side front fender by a car in the second lane. I was ruled "at fault" because I entered the other driver's lane of travel.