(-36)/(9+3) I would use parenthesis to execute proper order of operations.
I will assume it is written out as follows with no parenthesis... 3 / 3 / 5 I would stick to the order of operations, and go straight through it... 3 / 3 / 5 = 1 / 5 (or one-fifth) If there are parenthesis involved, they take priority.
I would answer no because 3√2 ____ 5√2 Would simplify to 3 divided by 5 and that is not irrational.
7 times 6 = 42 so that would be 7 divided by 6 with a remainder of one
Then the value of x would be 5.6 divided by 3.4
(-36)/(9+3) I would use parenthesis to execute proper order of operations.
I will assume it is written out as follows with no parenthesis... 3 / 3 / 5 I would stick to the order of operations, and go straight through it... 3 / 3 / 5 = 1 / 5 (or one-fifth) If there are parenthesis involved, they take priority.
y=3x(x+7)^2
it would equal 2xy
There might be a situation in which you would use a comma before a parenthesis, but generally you do not do this. A pair of parentheses already sets its contents apart from the rest of a sentence, so there is no need for a comma to precede the left parenthesis.
That would be a winking smiley face emoticon. ;)
If you divided it, it would give you "1.40625"
2
Any number divided by 1 (one) would equal that same number.
I would answer no because 3√2 ____ 5√2 Would simplify to 3 divided by 5 and that is not irrational.
The amount of heat transferred can be calculated using the equation Q = m * c * ΔT, where Q is the heat transferred, m is the mass of the substance, c is the specific heat capacity, and ΔT is the temperature change. By knowing the specific heat capacities of the two substances and their temperature changes, the heat transferred can be determined.
The answer would be 70. It would be seventy because estimate 2,130 divided by 33 is closest to 2,100 and 30 7 times 3= 21 so to get thusand 30 times 70