I don't know. I've never seen a Roman numeral with more than one lesser numeral preceding a greater numeral, as in "...CCM...". If you remove one of the C's, MCMLXXVII is 1977.
Because of the introduction of the Hindu-Arabic numeral system during the Middle Ages which was more efficient than the Roman numeral system inasmuch that it contained a zero symbol.
C according to romal numeral is 100 .so ,number greater than 100 are many .500 in roman numeral is written as D.
It is: 945+10 = 955 => CMLV
There isn't one. MMMCMXCIX is the largest Roman numeral because M may not repeat more than 3 times in succession. Thus values greater than 3999 cannot be represented by conventional Roman numerals. If we ignore the rule, 182 Ms would be the Roman numeral for 182,000.
I don't know. I've never seen a Roman numeral with more than one lesser numeral preceding a greater numeral, as in "...CCM...". If you remove one of the C's, MCMLXXVII is 1977.
D is 500 M is 1000
Because of the introduction of the Hindu-Arabic numeral system during the Middle Ages which was more efficient than the Roman numeral system inasmuch that it contained a zero symbol.
C according to romal numeral is 100 .so ,number greater than 100 are many .500 in roman numeral is written as D.
The Roman numeral system needed only 7 symbols while the ancient Greek numeral system needed 27 symbols
Roman Numeral
It is: 945+10 = 955 => CMLV
There isn't one. MMMCMXCIX is the largest Roman numeral because M may not repeat more than 3 times in succession. Thus values greater than 3999 cannot be represented by conventional Roman numerals. If we ignore the rule, 182 Ms would be the Roman numeral for 182,000.
Roman numerals gradually went out of general usage in the Middle Ages which was when the Hindu-Arabic numeral system was beginning to be used more often than the Roman numeral system.
A Roman numeral can be considered invalid due to several reasons. These include using a repetition of the same numeral more than three times in succession (e.g., IIII instead of IV), writing a numeral in a descending order (e.g., XCX instead of C), or using a numeral that is not part of the standard Roman numeral system (e.g., A instead of I).
CXXXXV is not a correctly written Roman numeral. The individual numerals within it are real numerals but according to the rules of writing Roman numerals 'no numeral can be written more than three times in succession.' So, XXXX is not allowed. The numerals you have written add up to 145 and the correct Roman numeral for this is CXLV
"IIV" is not a valid representation in Roman numerals. In Roman numerals, the correct representation of the number 7 is "VII," which is a combination of the symbols for 5 (V) and 2 (II). The subtractive principle in Roman numerals dictates that a smaller numeral before a larger one indicates subtraction, not addition.