Equivalent ratios to 16 can be found by multiplying or dividing 16 by the same non-zero number. For example, multiplying by 2 gives 32, and dividing by 4 gives 4. Therefore, 32:2 and 4:1 are both equivalent ratios to 16.
No, the ratios 3 to 4 and 15 to 16 are not equivalent. To determine if they are equivalent, you can cross-multiply: (3 \times 16 = 48) and (4 \times 15 = 60). Since 48 is not equal to 60, the two ratios are not equivalent.
They are: 3 to 8 or 6 to 16
Equivalent ratios for 16 to 28 can be found by multiplying or dividing both terms by the same number. For example, dividing both by 4 gives the equivalent ratio of 4 to 7. Other equivalent ratios include 32 to 56 (by multiplying both by 2) and 48 to 84 (by multiplying both by 3).
THey are: 16/14 and 24/21
16 : 2 24 : 3 32 : 4
No, they are not equivalent ratios. To make them equivalent, The second one should be 16 to 8.
4:16
No, the ratios 3 to 4 and 15 to 16 are not equivalent. To determine if they are equivalent, you can cross-multiply: (3 \times 16 = 48) and (4 \times 15 = 60). Since 48 is not equal to 60, the two ratios are not equivalent.
There are four equivalent ratios of the numbers 8 to 32. The four equivalent ratios are 4/16, 8/12, 7/1 and 3/5.
They are: 3 to 8 or 6 to 16
It you mean 16/10 then it is 8/5
No. 4/7 and 16/28 and 28/49 are equivalent ratios. The 4 and the 7 must be multiplied by the same number in order to maintain the ratio.
Equivalent ratios for 16 to 28 can be found by multiplying or dividing both terms by the same number. For example, dividing both by 4 gives the equivalent ratio of 4 to 7. Other equivalent ratios include 32 to 56 (by multiplying both by 2) and 48 to 84 (by multiplying both by 3).
THey are: 16/14 and 24/21
equivalent ratios are different ratios that name the same comparison
16 : 2 24 : 3 32 : 4
Yes, those two ratios are equal!