Equivalent ratios to 16 can be found by multiplying or dividing 16 by the same non-zero number. For example, multiplying by 2 gives 32, and dividing by 4 gives 4. Therefore, 32:2 and 4:1 are both equivalent ratios to 16.
No, the ratios 3 to 4 and 15 to 16 are not equivalent. To determine if they are equivalent, you can cross-multiply: (3 \times 16 = 48) and (4 \times 15 = 60). Since 48 is not equal to 60, the two ratios are not equivalent.
They are: 3 to 8 or 6 to 16
Equivalent ratios for 16 to 28 can be found by multiplying or dividing both terms by the same number. For example, dividing both by 4 gives the equivalent ratio of 4 to 7. Other equivalent ratios include 32 to 56 (by multiplying both by 2) and 48 to 84 (by multiplying both by 3).
THey are: 16/14 and 24/21
16 : 2 24 : 3 32 : 4
No, they are not equivalent ratios. To make them equivalent, The second one should be 16 to 8.
4:16
No, the ratios 3 to 4 and 15 to 16 are not equivalent. To determine if they are equivalent, you can cross-multiply: (3 \times 16 = 48) and (4 \times 15 = 60). Since 48 is not equal to 60, the two ratios are not equivalent.
There are four equivalent ratios of the numbers 8 to 32. The four equivalent ratios are 4/16, 8/12, 7/1 and 3/5.
No. 4/7 and 16/28 and 28/49 are equivalent ratios. The 4 and the 7 must be multiplied by the same number in order to maintain the ratio.
They are: 3 to 8 or 6 to 16
It you mean 16/10 then it is 8/5
Equivalent ratios for 16 to 28 can be found by multiplying or dividing both terms by the same number. For example, dividing both by 4 gives the equivalent ratio of 4 to 7. Other equivalent ratios include 32 to 56 (by multiplying both by 2) and 48 to 84 (by multiplying both by 3).
THey are: 16/14 and 24/21
equivalent ratios are different ratios that name the same comparison
16 : 2 24 : 3 32 : 4
Yes, those two ratios are equal!