Want this question answered?

Q: Which is a pair of a consecutive palindromic mileages after 10001 which is 110 miles apart?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

The only two consecutive numbers that are both prime are 2 and 3. Since there are no other even prime numbers (other than 2), there are no more pairs of consecutive prime numbers. Therefore, the term "twin primes" usually refers to pairs of prime numbers that are 2 numbers apart. Examples are (3, 5), (5, 7), (11, 13), (101, 103), and many others more. It is not currently know whether there are infinitely many twin primes.

The only option is 2 and 3. Other than that, the difference between any two prime numbers is at least 2; there are a large number of so-called "twin primes" which are two apart, such as 11 and 13; or 107 and 109.

A synonym for apart is "Separate".

There are only two consecutive numbers that are primes, namely 2 and 3. Otherwise there is always a gap of at least 2; two primes separated by a gap of exactly 2 (eg 3 and 5) are known as twin primes. If you are wanting to know what the twin primes between 1 and 200 are, then they are: {3, 5}, {5, 7}, {11, 13}, {17, 19}, {29, 31}, {41, 43}, {59, 61}, {71, 73}, {101, 103}, {107, 109}, {137, 139}, {149, 151}, {179, 181}, {191, 193}, {197, 199}.

There are no four consecutive integers whose sum equal four. For example:1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 100 + 1 + 2 + 3 = 6-1 + 0 + 1 + 2 = 2-2 + -1 + 0 + 1 = -2...and so on.On the other hand, if you want to use a very loose definition of consecutive, there are four non-integer values that are each one apart and whose sum equals 4. You can calculate them like this:x + (x + 1) + (x + 2) + (x + 3) = 4∴ 4x + 6 = 4∴ 4x = -2∴ x = -0.5so the numbers would be:-0.5, 0.5, 1.5, 2.5

Related questions

Two consecutive points in phase are one wavelength apart.

Consecutive odd and even integers are both 2 apart. That is the reason we use the same denotation to represent them in an equation. x and x+2

Italy (1934, 1938, 1982, 2006)

2552

Apart from 3, 5 and 7, there are no other prime triplets. There are infinitely many prime twins.

No factor of 10999 is divisible by 10998. Apart from 1 and 2, any pair of consecutive numbers must be co-prime: that is, they cannot have any prime factor in common.

The only two consecutive numbers that are both prime are 2 and 3. Since there are no other even prime numbers (other than 2), there are no more pairs of consecutive prime numbers. Therefore, the term "twin primes" usually refers to pairs of prime numbers that are 2 numbers apart. Examples are (3, 5), (5, 7), (11, 13), (101, 103), and many others more. It is not currently know whether there are infinitely many twin primes.

No. While Sir Steven Redgrave was the first to win gold in five consecutive Olympics that were held four years apart (1984, 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000) he was not the first to win gold in five consecutive Olympics. Prior to his feat .... 1) Aladár Gerevich of Hungary won gold in six consecutive Olympics (1932, 1936, 1948, 1952, 1956, 1960) in team Sabre fencing. There were no Olympics in 1940 and 1944 due to World War II. 2) Pál Kovács of Hungary won gold in five consecutive Olympics (1936, 1948, 1952, 1956, 1960) in team Sabre fencing. Since Redgrave accomplished the feat, Birgit Fischer of Germany won gold in canoeing at the 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 Olympics.

The only option is 2 and 3. Other than that, the difference between any two prime numbers is at least 2; there are a large number of so-called "twin primes" which are two apart, such as 11 and 13; or 107 and 109.

Yes, "breaking apart" is the progressive form of the particle verb "break apart". E.g., "He is breaking apart the rocks" or "The rocks are breaking apart".

There are only two consecutive numbers that are primes, namely 2 and 3. Otherwise there is always a gap of at least 2; two primes separated by a gap of exactly 2 (eg 3 and 5) are known as twin primes. If you are wanting to know what the twin primes between 1 and 200 are, then they are: {3, 5}, {5, 7}, {11, 13}, {17, 19}, {29, 31}, {41, 43}, {59, 61}, {71, 73}, {101, 103}, {107, 109}, {137, 139}, {149, 151}, {179, 181}, {191, 193}, {197, 199}.

There are no four consecutive integers whose sum equal four. For example:1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 100 + 1 + 2 + 3 = 6-1 + 0 + 1 + 2 = 2-2 + -1 + 0 + 1 = -2...and so on.On the other hand, if you want to use a very loose definition of consecutive, there are four non-integer values that are each one apart and whose sum equals 4. You can calculate them like this:x + (x + 1) + (x + 2) + (x + 3) = 4∴ 4x + 6 = 4∴ 4x = -2∴ x = -0.5so the numbers would be:-0.5, 0.5, 1.5, 2.5