Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe answer is 1kg for $1.80. <3
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe better value for money is 2 kg of grapes for 3.50. With this option, you are paying 1.75 per kilogram of grapes. On the other hand, with 1 kg for 1.80, you are paying 1.80 per kilogram, which is a higher price.
4.5 kg for 5 b
First one 1.80 + 1.80 = 3.60 so is 0.20 more expensive than 3.40
4.5 kg for $5 = 5/4.5 = 1.11 $ per kilogram 3.0 kg for $3 = 3/3.0 = 1.00 $ per kilogram
what should be the minimum value of the nearest kilogram of 54
teah knows best : 1 kg for $1.80 :)
The better value for money is 2 kg of grapes for 3.50. With this option, you are paying 1.75 per kilogram of grapes. On the other hand, with 1 kg for 1.80, you are paying 1.80 per kilogram, which is a higher price.
2kg of grapes for 3.40 1kg of grapes 1.80 therefore 2kg costs 3.60
4.5 kg for 5 b
1 kg for $1.80
First one 1.80 + 1.80 = 3.60 so is 0.20 more expensive than 3.40
4.5 kg for $5 = 5/4.5 = 1.11 $ per kilogram 3.0 kg for $3 = 3/3.0 = 1.00 $ per kilogram
what should be the minimum value of the nearest kilogram of 54
I would say yes. When has paper money ever held it's value?
2kg of grapes for 3.40 is 1.70 when divided by 2. So the 2kg grapes are cheaper.
I'd say the 2000 is better value for money. It is cheaper than the 3000, and the differences (different screen and in-built microphone) are not worth paying extra for.
It is 1.