4 g is a measure of mass whereas 520 k is a measure of absolute temperature (Kelvin). The two measure different characteristics. According to the basic rules of dimensional analyses, conversion between the two is not valid.
the 'k' in 'kg' means #one thousand'. Hence 2 kg = 2000 g obviously 2000 g > 1500 g Hence it follows 2 kg > 1500 g
the k means a thousand of them, so a km is 1000 meters and it is bigger.
To determine if M is bigger than K, we need specific values or context for both M and K. Without that information, it's impossible to make a comparison. If you provide the values or context, I can help clarify their relationship.
To calculate the equilibrium constant ( K ) at 298 K for a given reaction, you'll need the standard Gibbs free energy change (( \Delta G^\circ )) for the reaction, which can be determined from standard enthalpies and entropies of formation. The relationship between ( K ) and ( \Delta G^\circ ) is given by the equation ( \Delta G^\circ = -RT \ln K ), where ( R ) is the gas constant (8.314 J/mol·K) and ( T ) is the temperature in Kelvin. Rearranging this equation allows you to solve for ( K ) using the formula ( K = e^{-\Delta G^\circ / RT} ) once ( \Delta G^\circ ) is known.
It could be a g.
If you mean kg, then yes.
King
In kg the k is short for prefix kilo- which is thousand. 4 kg = 4,000 g
k
K is the bigger size.
the 'k' in 'kg' means #one thousand'. Hence 2 kg = 2000 g obviously 2000 g > 1500 g Hence it follows 2 kg > 1500 g
G-K- Chesterton The Apostle of Common Sense - 2000 was released on: USA: 4 September 2000
K. G. Mudge was born in 1881.
K. G. Mudge died in 1975.
K. G. Subramanyan was born in 1924.
G K Saunders was born in 1910.
K. G. Bopaiah was born in 1955.