4 g is a measure of mass whereas 520 k is a measure of absolute temperature (Kelvin). The two measure different characteristics. According to the basic rules of dimensional analyses, conversion between the two is not valid.
the 'k' in 'kg' means #one thousand'. Hence 2 kg = 2000 g obviously 2000 g > 1500 g Hence it follows 2 kg > 1500 g
Let ( G ) be a finite cyclic group generated by an element ( g ). Any subgroup ( H ) of ( G ) can be expressed as ( H = \langle g^k \rangle ) for some divisor ( k ) of the order of ( G ). The factor group ( G/K ) for some subgroup ( K ) is also cyclic, and by choosing ( K ) appropriately (for instance, ( K = \langle g^m \rangle ) where ( m ) divides the order of ( G )), we can ensure that ( G/K ) is isomorphic to ( H ). Thus, every subgroup ( H ) corresponds to a factor group ( G/K ) and vice versa, establishing the desired isomorphism relationships.
the k means a thousand of them, so a km is 1000 meters and it is bigger.
To determine if M is bigger than K, we need specific values or context for both M and K. Without that information, it's impossible to make a comparison. If you provide the values or context, I can help clarify their relationship.
5/6 is the same as 25/30 4/5 is the same as 24/30 Answer is YES.
If you mean kg, then yes.
King
In kg the k is short for prefix kilo- which is thousand. 4 kg = 4,000 g
k
K is the bigger size.
the 'k' in 'kg' means #one thousand'. Hence 2 kg = 2000 g obviously 2000 g > 1500 g Hence it follows 2 kg > 1500 g
G-K- Chesterton The Apostle of Common Sense - 2000 was released on: USA: 4 September 2000
K. G. Mudge was born in 1881.
K. G. Mudge died in 1975.
K. G. Subramanyan was born in 1924.
G K Saunders was born in 1910.
K. G. Bopaiah was born in 1955.