300.0 is larger than 3.0
3000 m = 3 km. And 2km = 2000m. So 3km is larger.
To compare 25,365 cm and 30 m, we need to convert 30 m to centimeters. Since 1 meter equals 100 centimeters, 30 m is 3,000 cm. Therefore, 25,365 cm is indeed larger than 30 m.
To compare 3000 decimeters (dm) and 30 meters (m), we need to convert them to the same unit. Since 1 meter equals 10 decimeters, 30 meters is equal to 300 decimeters. Therefore, 3000 dm is much greater than 30 m.
3 km are in 3000 m.
3000%30= 30 * 100%= 3000%
3,000 meters is greater. 3000 m = 3 km
To compare 3000 decimeters (dm) and 30 meters (m), we need to convert both to the same unit. Since 1 meter is equal to 10 decimeters, we can convert 30 meters to decimeters by multiplying 30 by 10, resulting in 300 dm. Therefore, 3000 dm is larger than 300 dm.
There are 100 cm in a Meter. Therefore, there are 3000 cm in 30 m. 3000 > 198, so no, 198 cm is less than 30 m.
3,000 is 99 times larger than 30, because it's 100 times as large as 30 is.
That is correct. 3000 cm is NOT 3 m
1 m = 100 cm ⇒ 30 m = 30 x 100 cm = 3000 cm
3000 m = 3 km. And 2km = 2000m. So 3km is larger.
Three (3) meters does not equal 3000 centimeters.
acc to length and conversion, 1 m=100 cm 30 m=3000 cm
To compare 25,365 cm and 30 m, we need to convert 30 m to centimeters. Since 1 meter equals 100 centimeters, 30 m is 3,000 cm. Therefore, 25,365 cm is indeed larger than 30 m.
To compare 3000 decimeters (dm) and 30 meters (m), we need to convert them to the same unit. Since 1 meter equals 10 decimeters, 30 meters is equal to 300 decimeters. Therefore, 3000 dm is much greater than 30 m.
3000