0 is bigger than -3
No. The sum of a negative number and a positive number has the absolute value of their difference and the sign of whichever of them was bigger - in absolute terms. So -3 + 4 = +1 (diff between 3 and 4 is 1, and the bigger number, 4, is positive) -3 + 3 = 0 (diff between 3 and 3 is 0, the sign for zero does not matter) -3 + 2 = -1 (diff between 3 and 2 is 1, and the bigger number, 3, is negative)
No it is smaller than 0
-4
a mixed number is needed when the numerator is bigger than the denominator however .6 as a fraction is simply equal to 6/10 which will reduce to 3/5 and that is the numerator isn't bigger than the denomenator meaning its not an improper fraction and you do not need to change it to a mixed number so the answer is simply 3/5 0 3/5
0 is bigger than -3
No. The sum of a negative number and a positive number has the absolute value of their difference and the sign of whichever of them was bigger - in absolute terms. So -3 + 4 = +1 (diff between 3 and 4 is 1, and the bigger number, 4, is positive) -3 + 3 = 0 (diff between 3 and 3 is 0, the sign for zero does not matter) -3 + 2 = -1 (diff between 3 and 2 is 1, and the bigger number, 3, is negative)
Any NEGATIVE number is SMALLER then 0, or less in value(-1,-2,-3...) BUT COUNTING numbers are GREATER than 0 (1,2,3...)
17
5
.25 is bigger since it is farther away from 0 on the number line.
A natural number is a whole number that's bigger than 0. So 3, 17 and 123343 are both but -17, 0 and -188772 are whole numbers only.
2 is bigger.
-4
No it is smaller than 0
There is only one way to change a decimal number to a number bigger than it. Any number such as 5821.2347 adding a zero to either end won't make it bigger. The only way is to get a number negative or smaller than 1 but not 0 than making it to the power of 0 can make it one which is bigger.
I don't think that there is a number bigger than its square as you are timesing the number Not true. Any number between 0 and 1 is bigger than its square.