answersLogoWhite

0

-- any number that has a decimal or a fraction part (a mixed number)

-- any negative number

-- any odd number

-- any number less than 2

-- any number that doesn't have a '2' in the last place

-- one of the numbers on the list of choices that you didn't include with your question

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why is zero not considered a counting number In timer down counters it counts down to zero?

If a timer is counting down from 30, it doesn't actually count 30. It starts counting at 29. If you are counting up to 10, you wouldn't count the number that you are counting from. If you counted 0, you would actually be counting 11 numbers.


What did Amy do to the resulting number to determine the starting number?

for Imagine That Amy Counted 60 Numbers Per Minutes And Continued To Count Non Stop Until She Reached 5,000 Determine A Reasonable Estimate Of The Number Of Hours A Would Take Amy To Complete the Counting


Is 1.8 a even or odd number?

Niether it wouldn't be counted in a group of odd and even numbers it would only be counted as a odd and even if you was counting in decimals


If a number is a counting numbering the opposite of a counting number then it is an integer true or false?

False. Counting numbers (also known as natural numbers) are positive integers starting from 1 (1, 2, 3, ...). The opposite of a counting number would be negative integers or zero, which are also integers, but not all integers are opposites of counting numbers. Thus, while some opposites of counting numbers are integers, not all integers are opposites of counting numbers.


Would a negative whole number also be a counting number?

No. Negative numbers are not counting numbers.


Why is zero a counting number?

zero is not a counting number. if you count the number of kids in a room, would you start with the number 0?


Has any person in the world counted to a trillion?

As of now, no individual has counted to a trillion in a single continuous effort due to the immense time and effort required. Counting to a trillion would take an estimated 31,688 years if counting one number per second without breaks. While there have been various attempts to count to large numbers, they usually involve shortcuts or are done in a more conceptual way rather than counting each number sequentially.


What is the next number after nine point five?

It depends on what number you are counting by. If you are counting by halves it would be 10 but if you were counting by 1 decimal it would be 9.6 and so on. Hope this helps, Popgirl33122


Why are only final goods and services counted in the total production?

Because counting intermediate inputs into final goods would be a form of double-counting, increasing the GDP artificially.


If you started counting non stop from the second you were born till when you were sixty five would you have counted to a billion yet?

You would count to 2,051,243,999


Can you count from 1 to 100000000000000000000?

Counting from 1 to 100 trillion (100,000,000,000,000) is theoretically possible, but it would take an impractically long time. Even if you counted one number per second, it would take over 3,000 years to reach that number. In practice, such a task is not feasible.


What does it look like if you counted to a googol?

Counting to a googol, which is (10^{100}), would be virtually impossible in a human lifetime. If you counted one number per second without stopping, it would take you about (3.17 \times 10^{91}) years to reach a googol, far exceeding the age of the universe, which is approximately (13.8) billion years. In essence, counting to a googol would require time scales that are incomprehensibly vast and beyond any practical or realistic scenario.