-- any number that has a decimal or a fraction part (a mixed number)
-- any negative number
-- any odd number
-- any number less than 2
-- any number that doesn't have a '2' in the last place
-- one of the numbers on the list of choices that you didn't include with your question
If a timer is counting down from 30, it doesn't actually count 30. It starts counting at 29. If you are counting up to 10, you wouldn't count the number that you are counting from. If you counted 0, you would actually be counting 11 numbers.
for Imagine That Amy Counted 60 Numbers Per Minutes And Continued To Count Non Stop Until She Reached 5,000 Determine A Reasonable Estimate Of The Number Of Hours A Would Take Amy To Complete the Counting
No. Negative numbers are not counting numbers.
zero is not a counting number. if you count the number of kids in a room, would you start with the number 0?
There is no underlined digit. If there was it would be that digit multiplied by 10n-1 where n is the number of the digit as counted from the right hand end, starting at 1.
If a timer is counting down from 30, it doesn't actually count 30. It starts counting at 29. If you are counting up to 10, you wouldn't count the number that you are counting from. If you counted 0, you would actually be counting 11 numbers.
for Imagine That Amy Counted 60 Numbers Per Minutes And Continued To Count Non Stop Until She Reached 5,000 Determine A Reasonable Estimate Of The Number Of Hours A Would Take Amy To Complete the Counting
Niether it wouldn't be counted in a group of odd and even numbers it would only be counted as a odd and even if you was counting in decimals
No. Negative numbers are not counting numbers.
zero is not a counting number. if you count the number of kids in a room, would you start with the number 0?
It depends on what number you are counting by. If you are counting by halves it would be 10 but if you were counting by 1 decimal it would be 9.6 and so on. Hope this helps, Popgirl33122
Because counting intermediate inputs into final goods would be a form of double-counting, increasing the GDP artificially.
You would count to 2,051,243,999
That would be counting them twice, they were already counted when new.
There is no underlined digit. If there was it would be that digit multiplied by 10n-1 where n is the number of the digit as counted from the right hand end, starting at 1.
Sum of the first n even numbers starting with 0 (counting 0 as the first number, 2 would be the second number.... etc) is n x (n-1)
If you were normally counting by 1, then the answer would be 3683.