Tags Geometry

Animals & Plants Arts & Entertainment Auto Beauty & Health Books and Literature Business Electronics Engineering & Technology Food & Drink History Hobbies Jobs & Education Law & Government Math People & Society Science Social Studies Sports Travel & Places

0

Subjects>Math>Math & Arithmetic

Which of the following statement about interpreting historical evidence is true?

Anonymous

∙ 13y ago

Updated: 12/19/2022

New sources and ideas may change the interpreting of events

Wiki User

∙ 13y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

Lao

The path is yours to walk; I am only here to hold up a mirror.

Chat with Lao

Rafa

There's no fun in playing it safe. Why not try something a little unhinged?

Chat with Rafa

Professor

I will give you the most educated answer.

Chat with Professor

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts

Q: Which of the following statement about interpreting historical evidence is true?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

imp

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

What is the difference between a fact and a statement?

The difference between fact and statement is that a fact is something that is empirically true and can be supported by evidence while a statement is a belief that may or may not be backed up with some type of evidence.

Why is it important to test your hypothesis and collect evidence?

A hypothesis is a testable statement. To check the accuracy of your statement, you need to design an experiment to test it and collect data. Then you analyze your data to see how well it supported your hypothesis.

When you interpret what you have observed you are inferring true or false?

When interpreting what you have observed, you are making an inference based on the available evidence. This inference can be either true or false depending on the accuracy of the observations and the validity of the reasoning used to make the interpretation.

Social inequality was both accepted and resisted in classical civilizations. What evidence might support this statement?

It was mainly on inequalities of both male and female.

What was Rene descartes' favorite food?

As a renowned philosopher and mathematician, René Descartes did not leave any documented evidence or indication of his favorite food. Descartes was known for his contributions to the fields of philosophy and mathematics, particularly his famous statement "Cogito, ergo sum" ("I think, therefore I am"). While his philosophical works are well-documented, his personal food preferences are not a topic of historical record or significance.

Trending Questions

What is another name for route 40 which goes through wheeling? What is 17 divided by 2103? What number is 120 percent of 74? Are bangs the same as a side fringe? What times what equals 24 in prime numbers? Can you show me the working for the square root of 441? What is the simplest fractional form for 36 percent? How many feet are 1 meter and 85 inches? How many square feet are in 3o x 50 inches? Are 37 and 42 relativley prime? How do you write out 2.6 mill? If you get paid three bags of gold but one is fake how do you determine which one it is? How do you write sixty four and five tenths? What squared number is a multiple of 3 other than 9? What is next 4 patterns for 460 435 410 385 360? How many months are decade? How many times can 50 go into 3? How many syllables are in the word cabin? Is 1250005 a composite number? What is the mean median and mode of 83 96 94 87 78 85?

Related Questions

What statement about historical claims is correct?

A good claim is supported by many pieces of reliable evidence.

What role does the artifact play in the preservation and interpretation of historical events through photography?

Photography artifacts play a crucial role in preserving and interpreting historical events by capturing moments in time and providing visual evidence for future generations to understand and learn from.

Historical thinking skills can be divided into three main processes asking questions and drawing conclusions.?

Historical thinking skills involve analyzing evidence, constructing arguments based on that evidence, and interpreting historical events within their context. By asking critical questions, making connections between events, and drawing well-supported conclusions, historians can gain a deeper understanding of the past.

Is there evidence from a recent flood?

If the Flood of Noah's day was a real historical event and was worldwide we would expect to find some or all of the following evidence on the earth: Lots of ...

What are methods of historical inquiry?

Some methods of historical inquiry include analyzing primary sources, conducting archival research, interpreting artifacts, studying oral histories, and using comparative analysis techniques. These methods help historians understand the past, evaluate evidence, and construct narratives about historical events and developments.

Why is historical thinking skill of interpretation important for historians?

The historical thinking skill of interpretation is important for historians because it allows them to analyze, evaluate, and draw conclusions from historical evidence. By interpreting the past, historians can uncover different perspectives, gain insights into why events occurred, and make sense of complex historical narratives. This skill is crucial for constructing accurate and meaningful historical interpretations.

Are there alternative ways of interpreting the evidence psych assignment study 1?

no

How can new evidence change historical interpreting?

If new evidence comes to light then it will change an historians view on it, if they write for example that John Wilkes Booth killed Lincoln and they stick by that view, and then they find new evidence that George from booth number 5 did it then of course the interpretation of that event will change and so will everybody's views on it

Is the following statement a observation or an inference the damage at this scene was caused by an explosion?

The statement "the damage at this scene was caused by an explosion" is an inference rather than an observation. An observation is a direct, factual statement based on sensory data, while an inference involves interpreting or drawing a conclusion based on observations. In this case, the statement goes beyond direct sensory data to make a conclusion about the cause of the damage, making it an inference.

What is historical method of inquiry?

The historical method of inquiry involves analyzing and interpreting historical events using primary sources and other forms of evidence. Historians use this method to reconstruct the past and understand the context, causes, and consequences of events. This process helps to provide a deeper insight into how and why events unfolded in a specific way.

The response of each society to European imperialism grew out of its larger historical development and its internal problems What evidence might support this statement?

p e n i s

What following Characteristic of a good thesis statement?

A good thesis statement is clear and specific, presenting a concise argument that can be supported with evidence. It should be relevant to the topic and guide the reader on what to expect in the rest of the paper.

Resources

Top Categories

Product

Company

Copyright ©2025 Infospace Holdings LLC, A System1 Company. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Answers.