answersLogoWhite

0

Since numbers don't stop, then factors don't stop, then proper factors don't stop. It's impossible to quantify an infinite answer.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

How often is the sum of a negative integer and positive integer zero?

The sum of a negative integer and a positive integer is zero only when the two integers have the same absolute value. For example, if you have -3 (negative integer) and +3 (positive integer), their sum is zero. However, in general, this situation occurs infrequently since it requires specific values. Most of the time, the sum will be a negative integer if the absolute value of the negative integer is greater than that of the positive integer, and a positive integer if the opposite is true.


What can you say about the sum of two positive integers?

The sum will be a positive integer.It will be at least as large as double the smaller integer and at most as large as double the larger integer.


Is a positive integer divisible by 13?

some are but most are not. There are actually an infinite number that are, 13, 26, 39, 52, etc. are all divisible by 13.


What figure has the most obtuse angles?

There is no limit to the number of obtuse angles a figure can have. A regular n-gon has n obtuse angles where n is any positive integer greater than 4.


What is the integer equivalent represented by 2's complement of the binary number 11000110?

To find the integer equivalent of the 2's complement binary number 11000110, first identify that it's negative since the most significant bit (MSB) is 1. To get the positive equivalent, invert the bits (00111001) and add 1, resulting in 00111010, which is 58 in decimal. Therefore, the integer equivalent of the 2's complement 11000110 is -58.

Related Questions

Which positive integer less than 1000 has the most factors?

840 with 32 factors


What is the product of greatest negative integer and smallest positive integer?

The smallest positive integer is 1. 1 is the multiplicative identity; ie anything times 1 is itself. The greatest negative integer is the most positive negative integer which is -1. Therefore the product of the greatest negative integer and the smallest positive integer is the greatest negative integer which is -1.


How often is the sum of a negative integer and positive integer zero?

The sum of a negative integer and a positive integer is zero only when the two integers have the same absolute value. For example, if you have -3 (negative integer) and +3 (positive integer), their sum is zero. However, in general, this situation occurs infrequently since it requires specific values. Most of the time, the sum will be a negative integer if the absolute value of the negative integer is greater than that of the positive integer, and a positive integer if the opposite is true.


What can you say about the sum of two positive integers?

The sum will be a positive integer.It will be at least as large as double the smaller integer and at most as large as double the larger integer.


Are the square roots of all positive integers are irrational?

It might seems like it, but actually no. Proof: sqrt(0) = 0 (0 is an integer, not a irrational number) sqrt(1) = 1 (1 is an integer, not irrational) sqrt(2) = irrational sqrt(3) = irrational sqrt(4) = 2 (integer) As you can see, there are more than 1 square root of a positive integer that yields an integer, not a irrational. While most of the sqrts give irrational numbers as answers, perfect squares will always give you an integer result. Note: 0 is not a positive integer. 0 is neither positive nor negative.


Why -1 is the greatest integer?

It is not - so the question is seriously flawed. If you stated that -1 was the greatest (most positive) negative integer you would be correct. However, numbers are infinite so you cannot state a greatest integer. Integers are both positive and negative numbers, but have to be whole numbers


What is the number of these proper factors 1234671214212842498498147196294?

That is a list of the proper divisors of 588. Most definitions of proper factors do not include the number 1.


What number has the most prime factors?

Hi... Every integer can be expressed as the product of prime numbers (and these primes are it's factors). Since we can multiply any integer by 2 to create a larger integer which can also be expressed as the product of primes, and this number has more prime factors than the last, we can always get a bigger number with more prime factors. Therefore, there is no definable number with the most primes (much like there is no largest number)!


How does 48 have the most factors?

It doesn't. 48 has the most factors of positive numbers under 50.


Which positive integer less than 100 has the most proper factors?

Sometimes the number 1 is included in the proper factors, and sometimes it is not. In the list of factors I have included the number 1. The following numbers have 10 or 11 proper factors, depending on whether 1 is allowed as a proper factor. The factors of 60 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30. The factors of 72 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36. The factors of 84 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 12, 14, 21, 28, 42. The factors of 90 are 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15, 18, 30, 45. The factors of 96 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48.


What is an antonym for proper factor in math?

I suppose you could call them improper factors, but the term most often used for factors that aren't proper is "trivial."


Is a positive integer divisible by 13?

some are but most are not. There are actually an infinite number that are, 13, 26, 39, 52, etc. are all divisible by 13.