0
What else can I help you with?
What property justifies 412 equals 412?
Reflexive property
What is the property that justifies this statement If 3x 4 35 then 3x 39?
The property that justifies the statement is the transitive property of inequality. This property states that if one quantity is greater than another, and that second quantity is greater than a third, then the first quantity is also greater than the third. In this case, if (3x + 4 > 35) and (35 > 39), then it follows that (3x + 4 > 39). However, please note that the inequality as written seems incorrect; it should be (3x + 4 > 35) leading to (3x > 31) and not (39).
Which axiom justifies the statement RS equals RS?
Reflexive
what- choose the property of equality that justifies the step.?
transitive
Which of the following reasons can be used for statement 5 of the proof?
substitution property of equality
Which property justifies the following statement if W plus -8 equals 16 then w plus -8 plus 8 equals 16 plus 8?
It is the property that equals plus equals are equals.
Which property of equality justifies the statement If y plus 7 equals 9 then y equals 2?
Substitution property.
Which postulate of algebra justifies the statement 2x3x-1 6x2-2x for all values of x is it Multiplicative property or Distributive property or Associative property?
2x(3x-1) = 6x2-2x because of the distributive property.
Which property justifies 3x-6 equals 17?
There is no property that justifies it. The equation is true for some values of x, not for others.
What property justifies 412 equals 412?
Reflexive property
Which axiom justifies the statement RS RS?
Reflexive
Is this statement true or falseThis following statement is an example of the Multiplication Property of Inequality?
true
What is the property that justifies this statement If 3x 4 35 then 3x 39?
The property that justifies the statement is the transitive property of inequality. This property states that if one quantity is greater than another, and that second quantity is greater than a third, then the first quantity is also greater than the third. In this case, if (3x + 4 > 35) and (35 > 39), then it follows that (3x + 4 > 39). However, please note that the inequality as written seems incorrect; it should be (3x + 4 > 35) leading to (3x > 31) and not (39).
Which axiom justifies the statement RS equals RS?
Reflexive
what- choose the property of equality that justifies the step.?
transitive
Which property is illustrated by the following statement if zxy fde and fde cab then zxy cab?
transitive property
Which property is illustrated by the following statement If hax rig then rig hax?
symmetric
