That term, over there!
No, it is imaginary. Irrational numbers are a subset of real numbers Real numbers and imaginary numbers are sets without any overlap.
You have it backwards. Integers are a subset of real numbers.
The real numbers, themselves. Every set is a subset of itself.
Starting at the top, we have the real numbers. The rational numbers is a subset of the reals. So are the irrational numbers. Now some rationals are integers so that is a subset of the rationals. Then a subset of the integers is the whole numbers. The natural numbers is a subset of those.
The complex numbers.
Imaginary numbers are not a subset of the real numbers; imaginary means not real.
Irrational Numbers which are a subset of Real Numbers which are a subset of Complex Numbers ...
That term, over there!
No, it is imaginary. Irrational numbers are a subset of real numbers Real numbers and imaginary numbers are sets without any overlap.
No because natural numbers are a subset of real numbers
You have it backwards. Integers are a subset of real numbers.
Integers are a subset of rational numbers which are a subset of real numbers which are a subset of complex numbers ...
-28 belongs to: Integers, which is a subset of rationals, which is a subset of reals, which is a subset of complex numbers.
The real numbers, themselves. Every set is a subset of itself.
Starting at the top, we have the real numbers. The rational numbers is a subset of the reals. So are the irrational numbers. Now some rationals are integers so that is a subset of the rationals. Then a subset of the integers is the whole numbers. The natural numbers is a subset of those.
The set of Rational Numbers is a [proper] subset of Real Numbers.