There is no shape with only four triangular faces and five vertices. If there is also a quadrilateral face then it is a quadrialteral based pyramid.
There is no such shape. The only convex shape that has four faces is a tetrahedron, and that has four vertices, not 5.
A dodecagon is a plane shape and so has only one face. It has 12 sides and 12 vertices.
You can't have a 3-d shape with only 2 faces. A triangular prism has 9 edges and 6 vertices, but it has 5 faces.
The answer will depend on what is known of the shape. If you know only the number of faces, or only the number of vertices, then you cannot work out the number of edges. If you only know the shapes of the faces you cannot.The answer will depend on what is known of the shape. If you know only the number of faces, or only the number of vertices, then you cannot work out the number of edges. If you only know the shapes of the faces you cannot.The answer will depend on what is known of the shape. If you know only the number of faces, or only the number of vertices, then you cannot work out the number of edges. If you only know the shapes of the faces you cannot.The answer will depend on what is known of the shape. If you know only the number of faces, or only the number of vertices, then you cannot work out the number of edges. If you only know the shapes of the faces you cannot.
There is no shape with only four triangular faces and five vertices. If there is also a quadrilateral face then it is a quadrialteral based pyramid.
There is no shape with only four triangular faces and five vertices. If there is also a quadrilateral face then it is a quadrialteral based pyramid.
There is no such shape. The only convex shape that has four faces is a tetrahedron, and that has four vertices, not 5.
There can be no such shape. A hexagon is a 2-dimensional shape and so has only one face, six sides and 6 vertices.
A dodecagon is a plane shape and so has only one face. It has 12 sides and 12 vertices.
You can't have a 3-d shape with only 2 faces. A triangular prism has 9 edges and 6 vertices, but it has 5 faces.
The answer will depend on what is known of the shape. If you know only the number of faces, or only the number of vertices, then you cannot work out the number of edges. If you only know the shapes of the faces you cannot.The answer will depend on what is known of the shape. If you know only the number of faces, or only the number of vertices, then you cannot work out the number of edges. If you only know the shapes of the faces you cannot.The answer will depend on what is known of the shape. If you know only the number of faces, or only the number of vertices, then you cannot work out the number of edges. If you only know the shapes of the faces you cannot.The answer will depend on what is known of the shape. If you know only the number of faces, or only the number of vertices, then you cannot work out the number of edges. If you only know the shapes of the faces you cannot.
That's an impossible shape. No shape can have only 2 edges.
A square or rectangular pyramid.NO. The above have four triangular faces PLUS a square or rectangular face. A tetrahedron has only four faces, all of which are triangular.A triangular based pyramid has 4 triangular faces, 6 edges and 4 vertices
If the shape was simply connected then the Euler characteristic would require it to have only two vertices. No such shape exists.
A rectangle is a plane figure and so has only one face. It has four sides (edges) and four vertices.
Imagine a house's roof -- two triangles joined by lines to their matching vertices. This gives you 6 vertices and only 5 sides.