Anise and star anise are two different things. There is no equivalence.
No. It is .011 or 11 over 1000.
If you mean: (0, 11) then y = x+11
there are 5 sides to a star, so its 1/5
== == 1 circle = 2 stars
There is no such thing as a star with a magnitude brighter than -1. Negative magnitudes indicate brighter objects, with the most negative magnitudes corresponding to the brightest objects in the sky.
A magnitude 1 star is 100 times brighter than a magnitude 6 star.A magnitude 1 star is 100 times brighter than a magnitude 6 star.A magnitude 1 star is 100 times brighter than a magnitude 6 star.A magnitude 1 star is 100 times brighter than a magnitude 6 star.
It would be -1 the further Negative you go the brighter the star.
To calculate the brightness difference between a magnitude +4 star and a magnitude +7 star, you can use the formula: Brightness ratio = 2.512 ^ (m1 - m2), where m1 is the magnitude of the brighter star (+4) and m2 is the magnitude of the fainter star (+7). Substituting the values into the formula, you would find that the magnitude +4 star is approximately 15.85 times brighter than the magnitude +7 star.
A star with a magnitude of 1 is the brightest, followed by a magnitude of 2 and then a magnitude of 3. The lower the magnitude, the brighter the star appears in the sky.
A magnitude 1 star is 2.5 times brighter than a magnitude 2 star. This is because the magnitude scale is logarithmic, with each whole number representing a brightness difference of about 2.5 times.
Lower magnitude numbers are brighter; negative numbers represent brighter objects than positive numbers.
The way stellar magnitude works, a smaller number is associated with increased brightness. Since -3 < -2, a magnitude -3 star would be brighter than a magnitude -2 star. Each decrease in magnitude by 1 means in increase in brightness by a factor of about 2.5119. Equivalently, each decrease in magnitude by 5 means an increase in brightness by a factor of 100. Incidentally, the brightest star in the sky (Sirius) has an apparent magnitude of only about -1.5.
Its brightness. the bigger the number, the fainter. So, -1 is brighter than 5.
A 3rd magnitude star is brighter than a 5th magnitude star by a factor of 6.25.Each integer difference of magnitude represents a change in apparent brightness of 2.5 times. Hence, a 3rd magnitude star is 2.5 x 2.5 = 6.25 times brighter than a 5th magnitude star.(check related links)
The main difference is brightness: a twelfth magnitude star is brighter than a fifteenth magnitude star. Magnitude is a logarithmic scale, so each step in magnitude represents a difference in brightness of about 2.5 times. This means a twelfth magnitude star is approximately 12.5 times brighter than a fifteenth magnitude star.
Absolutely. When speaking of the brightness you see from earth, you are speaking of apparent magnitude. When considering the type of star, it's composition, stage, age, size, distance, etc., a star is also assigned an absolute magnitude, so the ranking of the star if seen from similar distances reveals the truth about a star. 3.26 light years away is the assumed distance in ranking stars. A star many times farther away than a second star may appear much brighter than the second star which is much closer, based partially on the various factors mentioned above. The lower the value for a magnitude, the brighter, or more correctly, the more luminous, a star. Thus, a 3.4 is brighter than a 5.1, for example. Long ago the scale was originally an arbitrary ranking based on certain stars that were considered to be the brightest. Since then, stars even brighter have been identified, thus the need to use values even less than zero. Only a handful of stars fall below zero in apparent magnitude. So then it is not significant where in the sky (in what constellation) a star lies, the magnitude value determines the brightness.