Generally, a cylinder is considered stronger than a cuboid when it comes to withstanding pressure and stress. This is due to its shape, which allows for even distribution of forces along its curved surface, reducing the likelihood of structural failure. In contrast, a cuboid has flat surfaces and edges that can create points of weakness under stress. Therefore, in applications like engineering and construction, cylindrical structures often provide greater structural integrity.
There cannot be any such object as a cylinder cuboid.
Given a cuboid it is always possible to have a cylinder with the same volume.
They can be, and are, cuboid. Cylindrical pillars are preferred because they do not have sharp corners.
It could be a cylinder or a cuboid
The pyramid is generally considered the strongest structure among the options listed. Its triangular base provides stability and distributes weight evenly, allowing it to withstand external forces better than the others. Cylinders also have good strength and resistance to compression, but the pyramid's shape and structural efficiency make it superior for load-bearing. Cubes and cuboids, while strong, do not offer the same level of stability as the pyramid under varying conditions.
Examples of 3 dimensional structure are a pyramid, a cone, a cylinder, a prism, a cuboid ... etc
A cylinder, a sphere or a dome.
There cannot be any such object as a cylinder cuboid.
A cuboid cylinder is an impossible shape - just as a square circle is.
Given a cuboid it is always possible to have a cylinder with the same volume.
A cylinder has a circular cross-section whereas a cuboid has a quadrilateral cross-section.
Yes.
They can be, and are, cuboid. Cylindrical pillars are preferred because they do not have sharp corners.
Te answer you're looking for is... cylinder.
a cyilinder has 3 sides
It could be a cylinder or a cuboid
How about a cylinder or a cuboid