The vocabulary term defined as an opinion or decision based on analysis is "judgment." It involves evaluating information, weighing evidence, and drawing conclusions to form a reasoned stance or opinion. Judgment is often applied in various contexts, including legal, ethical, and personal decision-making scenarios.
An invalid opinion is a viewpoint that lacks sound reasoning or factual support, making it less credible or justifiable. It often arises from misconceptions, biases, or misinformation rather than a logical analysis of evidence. While everyone is entitled to their opinions, an invalid opinion may not hold weight in rational discourse or decision-making.
Technical vs. fundamental analysisThe primary difference can be summed up in terms of both the underlying philosophy, and the data studied. Fundemental analysis is concerned chiefly with discovering asset values. The data relied upon includes off exchange sources such as balance sheets, income statements and supply and demand statistics.Technical analysis on the other hand, is concerned chiefly with the timing of buy and sell decisions. The data studied is generated exclusively by the exchanges.Where does investor sentiment fall within these two definitions? If the sentiment data is derived from options data, then it would fit the definition of technical analysis. If on the other hand the data was generated by opinion polls, then it would not fit the definition of technical analysis. Nor would it be considered fundamental analysis either. It would more properly and simply be defined as "sentiment analysis."While there is some debate over whether off-exchange data (e.g. astrological data, dividends, opinion polls, etc.) properly belong under the definition of technical analysis, none of the main organizing bodies for technical analysis have ever rendered an official, public opinion on this question.According to noted technical analyst Daniel Chesler, CMT --"Technical analysis is the forecasting of markets through the study and analysis of data generated exclusively from the buying and selling of financial instruments. It is part science and part formalization of trader intuition and experience. Any market for which there is a regular, transparent transaction history is a candidate for technical analysis. Planetary cycles, opinion polls, fundamental, monetary and economic data as well as any data not specifically generated from the buying and selling process, are not a part of orthodox technical analysis."
There are different nearest word for Judgement, E.g.- assessment, judging, sound judgement, judicial decision, sagacity, opinion, sagaciousness, sound judgment, mind, perspicacity, discernment, judgment, legal opinion etc
In my opinion the question is poorly defined, since "non-polynomial" could be just about anything.
Being unanimous means that all members of a group agree on a particular decision or opinion without any dissent. It signifies complete consensus, where everyone involved shares the same viewpoint or conclusion. This term is often used in decision-making contexts, such as votes or resolutions, indicating that there is no opposition or differing perspectives among participants.
concurring opinion. In a concurring opinion, a justice expresses agreement with the outcome reached by the majority but provides their own reasoning or interpretation of the law. This allows the justice to emphasize specific points or provide alternative legal analysis.
Expert opinion can be defined as the statement from a specialist on a specific subject.
The Four types of Supreme Court Opinions Includes: Unanimous Opinion: When the Supreme Court Justice Unanimously agrees with the decision. Majority Opinion: When the Majority agrees with the decision Concurrent Opinion: When a person agrees with the Majority of the decision, but for different reasons. Dissenting Opinion: When A person disagree with the Majority of the decision.
Fair use is based on a 1740 decision in Gyles vs Wilcox which defined a notion of "fair abridgment." The opinion was written by Phillip Yorke, the first Earl of Hardwicke.
A decision or opinion to which most justices agree may be called a "majority decision" or "majority opinion". When a majority agreeing to a single point-of-view issues a unified written decision, the term is "opinion of the Court."
An invalid opinion is a viewpoint that lacks sound reasoning or factual support, making it less credible or justifiable. It often arises from misconceptions, biases, or misinformation rather than a logical analysis of evidence. While everyone is entitled to their opinions, an invalid opinion may not hold weight in rational discourse or decision-making.
The written legal reasoning behind a court's decision is called an opinion.
If more justices agree with a concurring opinion than with the opinion of the Court, the decision is called a plurality.
A concurring opinion is a separate opinion written by a judge who agrees with the majority decision of the court but for different reasons or a different interpretation of the law. It provides additional insight or perspective to the court's decision.
The US Supreme Court decision is called the "opinion of the Court," which most often refers to the majority opinion (decision signed by the most justices) on a case. Sometimes, however, the "official decision" may be a "per curiam" ruling (issued unsigned) or a "plurality" (an opinion, often concurring in judgment, endorsed by more justices than the formal "opinion of the Court.").For more information, see Related Questions, below.
opinion
An unbiased opinion is a perspective that is fair, impartial, and free from personal prejudices or emotions. It is based on objective analysis, facts, and evidence rather than individual beliefs or external influences. Such an opinion aims to consider multiple viewpoints and provide a balanced assessment of a situation or topic. Unbiased opinions are essential for informed decision-making and constructive dialogue.