We don't know for certain who discovered the platonic solids first. However, Pythagoras is credited by some sources as discovering the platonic solids first. Other sources credit Theaetetus as being the first to describe all five platonic solids and proving that these are the *only* platonic solids.
The book called Platonic Solids: The experience
There are different numbers on the different platonic solids.
The Platonic solids were name after the Greek philosopher Plato, who theorized that the classical elements were constructed from the regular solids.
Euclid was the one who proved that there are only five platonic solids.
We don't know for certain who discovered the platonic solids first. However, Pythagoras is credited by some sources as discovering the platonic solids first. Other sources credit Theaetetus as being the first to describe all five platonic solids and proving that these are the *only* platonic solids.
The Name Platonic solid Comes from Plato the second main reseacher of the five solids. Pythagoras was the one discovered the platonic solids
There (not their) are 5 platonic solids.
It is known that in the Neolithic period, platonic solids were carved out of stone. The Greeks also studied them quite a bit. Of course, Plato also studied them and they are named after him. So it is not easy to answer the question how were they discovered, but it seems they were stone carvings.
The book called Platonic Solids: The experience
There are different numbers on the different platonic solids.
There are 5 platonic solids. They are: Tetrahedron, Octahedron, Icosahedron, Cube, and Dodecahedron
Why are there a limited number of platonic solids?Read more: Why_are_there_a_limited_number_of_platonic_solids
The Platonic solids were name after the Greek philosopher Plato, who theorized that the classical elements were constructed from the regular solids.
Euclid was the one who proved that there are only five platonic solids.
A cube is the only platonic solid which is a prism.
Because 6 platonic solids would be too many, and 4 wouldn't be enough