pie r squared
Brilliant as this above answer is, just in case someone out there might want the real answer: The actual problem was totake a disc in the plane, cut it into finitely many pieces, and reassemble the pieces so as to get a square of equal to the area. This was proven to be possible by Miklos Laczkovich in 1990; the decomposition makes heavy use of th the axiom of choice and is therefore non-constructive. Laczkovich's decomposition uses about 1050 different pieces.
When you analyze a problem you look it over which is what analyzing means. You look over the problem and then you solve it. When you solve a problem you solve it and you use certain steps and solve it but of course everyone has there ways to solve a problem but some people have ways to solve it by just analysing it. That is the difference.
In a circle
Analyzing it!
yes it can be solve
The easiest way to solve an algebra problem is to work out the problem.
For example, you try out squaring different numbers, until you get close enough.
It is to use science for a practical job or to solve a problem.
It means to solve everything in the problem except pi.
When you analyze a problem you look it over which is what analyzing means. You look over the problem and then you solve it. When you solve a problem you solve it and you use certain steps and solve it but of course everyone has there ways to solve a problem but some people have ways to solve it by just analysing it. That is the difference.
by squaring the the last numbers and adding it we get answer following by multiplying 2nd and 3rd number.
It didn't solve any problem it was invented as a sport not as a way to solve anything...
no it can not solve the problem
The formula for the equation of a circle is (x – h)2+ (y – k)2 = r2, where (h, k) represents the coordinates of the center of the circle, and r represents the radius of the circle.
how can geography solve the problem of street urchins?
How do you solve the problem of physical memory dump?
In a circle
How to solve this problem v427