Using the remainder theorem:- The function of x becomes f(-2) because the divisor is x+2 Substitute -2 for x in the dividend: 2x3+x-7 When: f(-2) = 2(-2)3+(-2)-7 = -25 Then: -25 is the remainder
Do the division, and see if there is a remainder.
No, a corollary follows from a theorem that has been proven. Of course, a theorem can be proven using a corollary to a previous theorem.
A corollary.
No. A corollary is a statement that can be easily proved using a theorem.
Using the remainder theorem:- The function of x becomes f(-2) because the divisor is x+2 Substitute -2 for x in the dividend: 2x3+x-7 When: f(-2) = 2(-2)3+(-2)-7 = -25 Then: -25 is the remainder
Do the division, and see if there is a remainder.
The remainder theorem states that if you divide a polynomial function by one of it's linier factors it's degree will be decreased by one. This theorem is often used to find the imaginary zeros of polynomial functions by reducing them to quadratics at which point they can be solved by using the quadratic formula.
No, a corollary follows from a theorem that has been proven. Of course, a theorem can be proven using a corollary to a previous theorem.
To find the number, we need to consider the remainders when the number is divided by 5 and 4. Let's denote the number as x. From the information given, we have two equations: x ≡ 1 (mod 5) and x ≡ 2 (mod 4). By solving these congruences simultaneously using the Chinese Remainder Theorem, we find that x ≡ 21 (mod 20). Therefore, the number you are thinking of is 21.
A corollary.
A corollary is a statement that can easily be proved using a theorem.
No. A corollary is a statement that can be easily proved using a theorem.
No. A corollary is a statement that can be easily proved using a theorem.
There is no formula for a theorem. A theorem is a proposition that has been or needs to be proved using explicit assumptions.
Using the remainder theorem:- f(x) = 4x3+6x2+3x+2 f(x) becomes f(-3/2) or f(-1.5) because the divisor is 2x+3 f(-1.5) = 4(-1.5)3+6(-1.5)2+3(-1.5)+2 = -5/2 or -2.5 So the remainder is -2.5
(x^3 + 3x^2 - x - 2)/[(x + 3)(x + 5) in this case you can use the long division to divide polynomials and to find the remainder of this division. But you cannot use neither the synthetic division to divide polynomials nor the Remainder theorem to determine the remainder. You can use both the synthetic division and the Remainder theorem only if the divisor is in the form x - c. In this case the remainder must be a constant because its degree is less than 1, the degree of x - c. The remainder theorem says that if a polynomial f(x) is divided by x - c, then the remainder is f(c). If the question is to determine the remainder by using the remainder theorem, then you are asking to find the value of f(-3) when you are dividing by x + 3, or f(-5)when you are dividing by x + 5 . Just substitute -3 or -5 with x into the dividend x^3 + 3x^2 - x - 2, and you can find directly the value of the remainder. f(-3) = (-3)^3 + 3(-3)^2 - (-3) - 2 = -27 + 27 + 3 - 2 = 1 (remainder is 1) f(-5) = (-5)^3 + 3(-5)^2 - (-5) - 2 = -125 + 75 + 5 - 2 = -47 (remainder is -47).