answersLogoWhite

0

In ancient Rome the numerals of VL would have been perfectly acceptable as being the equivalent of 45.

But the real rules governing the original Roman numeral system were changed during the Middle Ages and as a result the equivalent of 45 in Roman numerals today is considered to be XLV.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why VL in Roman numerals is incorrect?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp