Sure they are. They fulfill all the requirements of a trapezoid. To be precise, it depends how exactly you choose to define a trapezoid. If you define a trapezoid as a quadrilateral which has AT LEAST one pair of parallel sides, then that applies to rectangles as well. If you want it to have EXACTLY one pair of parallel sides, then a rectangle is not a trapezoid, since it has two pairs of parallel sides.
Both trapezoids and rectangles are quadrilaterals.
how are trapezoids and rectangles
squares and rectangles
Squares, parallelograms, rhombuses, and trapezoids are quadrilaterals that are not rectangles.
they are not congruent
Both trapezoids and rectangles are quadrilaterals.
NO rectangles are trapezoids
trapezoids and rectangles, are both quadrilateral (which means shapes with 4 sides). rectangles and trapezoids are also polygons.
Oh, dude, like technically speaking, all rectangles are trapezoids, but not all trapezoids are rectangles. It's like saying all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. So, yeah, some trapezoids can be rectangles, but not all of them. It's like a geometry mind game, man.
how are trapezoids and rectangles
squares and rectangles
Squares, parallelograms, rhombuses, and trapezoids are quadrilaterals that are not rectangles.
Trapezoids have only two sides parallel; rectangles have all four opposing sides parallel. Also, rectangles have 4 right angles, which is more than a trapezoid can have.
they are not congruent
Parallelograms, squares, trapezoids and rectangles
No, trapezoids are not rectangles. While both shapes have four sides, rectangles have opposite sides that are equal in length and all interior angles are right angles, whereas trapezoids have only one pair of opposite sides that are parallel.
Isosceles trapezoids, squares, and rectangles.