They're not. Prime numbers and square numbers are different things.
Prime numbers cannot be square numbers.
No.
An oxymoron. Prime numbers can't be square. Square numbers can't be prime. You can square a prime number: 3 x 3 - 32 = 9
A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.
no, impossible.
Prime numbers cannot be square numbers.
No.
no, impossible.
There are no prime numbers that are square numbers
An oxymoron. Prime numbers can't be square. Square numbers can't be prime. You can square a prime number: 3 x 3 - 32 = 9
A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.
I think there just called numbers quote the words i think
Because square numbers have more than two factors whereas prime numbers have only two factors
Absolutely not. A square number has an integer square root, so by definition it has at least one factor. Prime numbers have no factors
None because square numbers have more than two factors
Square numbers can't be prime. They have too many factors.
Numbers that are not prime numbers are called composite numbers.