You need two measurements for a rectangle: length x width. If both are equal, you should say so (in this case, it is a square).
A rectangle that is not square is an "oblong". Or you could say a "box".
If you meant to say "rectangle", then yes.
Just tell us the rectangle's length and width, and we'll whip out the answer faster than you can say "multiply".
That depends how wide it is; it is not possible to calculate the area without a width. (As you say "rectangle" I'm assuming the width is different to the length).
~(A => B) is ~B => ~A That is to say, the converse of "A implies B" is "the converse of B implies the converse of A". In this case: If a shape is not a parallelogram then it is not a rectangle.
You need two measurements for a rectangle: length x width. If both are equal, you should say so (in this case, it is a square).
Yes... He wont say who. They have askd him number of times and he says "i do have someone speacial but i am not gonna say who it is"
It's the same - rectangle
A rectangle that is not square is an "oblong". Or you could say a "box".
rektangel
When you say "2m by 3m," you are referring to the dimensions of a rectangle. The "2m" represents the length of the rectangle, and the "3m" represents the width. To find the area of the rectangle, you would multiply the length by the width. In this case, the area would be 2m x 3m = 6 square meters.
Well, I'd have to say...Polygon
as rectangle is to square I would say Rectangle is to Triangle. Because Hexagon-6sides, pentagon-5 sides, Rectangle-4 sides, triangle 3 sides. But that is just me :)
It depends on what you consider a rectangle.A square is a special type of rectangle (and not vise versa).If you go by that a rectangle is simply a four-sided figure, then you go by that a square is a spacial type of rectangle that has all sides congruent. If this is the case, then no, not all rectangles are regular as a "regular" rectangle would be considered a square. A rectangle is a parallelogram (and not vise versa).If you go by that a four-sided figure is called a parallelogram, then there are more rules you go by. You would say that there are three spacial types of parallelograms. One is a rhombus, a parallelogram with four congruent sides. The second is a rectangle, a parallelogram with four right-angles. The third is a special type of parallelogram as well as a rhombus. A square is a parallelogram with four equal sides and four right-angles. A square is also classified as a rhombus with four right-angles. In this case, no, a square would be a regular rectangle.A rectangle is a four-sided figure.If you go by the rule that a square is not a rectangle, then yes, all rectangles are regular, unless you think a parallelogram is a type of rectangle, in that case, no.
If you meant to say "rectangle", then yes.
It may, or it may not be. We cannot say a quadrilateral is never a square. A quadrilateral is a figure with four line segments for sides (edges) and four vertices (internal angles). If all the sides are the same length and and one of the interior angles is a right angle, all the interior angles will be right angles and you will have a square. All squares are quadrilaterals, but not all quadrilaterals are squares. Most aren't. A square is a special case of a quadrilateral. So is a rectangle. A square is a special case of a rectangle, while we're on the subject. Every square is a rectangle, but not every rectangle is a square.