Arabic numbers need less digits to represent large numbers (in general). When doing arithmetic operations on the numbers, Arabic is easier because of the place values can line up.
27, in Arabic numerals.
The Roman numeral of XXII is equivalent to the Arabic numeral of 22
The Roman numerals of CCCLXXXIII are equivalent to the Hindu-Arabic numerals of 383
In today's notation of Roman numerals they represent 341 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
There is no system called "Arabic numbers". XII can be defined by a set of Arabic NUMERALS, but not by a single character.Improved Answer:-The Roman numerals of XII equals 12 in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
the veins
27, in Arabic numerals.
The Roman numeral of XXII is equivalent to the Arabic numeral of 22
The Roman numerals of CCCLXXXIII are equivalent to the Hindu-Arabic numerals of 383
In today's notation of Roman numerals they represent 341 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
on converting the Arabic number into roman numerals we get that : 100 in roman numerals is written as : C C is used for 100 in roman numerals .
There is no system called "Arabic numbers". XII can be defined by a set of Arabic NUMERALS, but not by a single character.Improved Answer:-The Roman numerals of XII equals 12 in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
Spend a day using only roman numerals instead of Arabic numerals. The disadvantages will become painfully obvious.
829
It is equivalent to 3307 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
If you are talking about roman numerals, the the numerals in Hindu Arabic is: 246
on converting the Arabic number into roman numerals we get that 300 in roman numerals is written as : CCC as C=100.