IIII (or IV) is a Roman numeral which represents the number 4.
Yes
IV or IIII
Generally the Roman numeral IV represents the number 4 but on some old watches and sun dials 4 is represented by the numeral IIII. The numeral IIII was correct when it was written but convention now decrees that a numeral should not be repeated more than three times. According to this rule IIII should no longer be used.
Yes, IV or IIII
IIII (or IV) is a Roman numeral which represents the number 4.
Yes
IV or IIII
Generally the Roman numeral IV represents the number 4 but on some old watches and sun dials 4 is represented by the numeral IIII. The numeral IIII was correct when it was written but convention now decrees that a numeral should not be repeated more than three times. According to this rule IIII should no longer be used.
Yes, IV or IIII
It is IIII but they are both the equivalent of 4
4, as a Roman Numeral, should be written as IV, although I have seen it occassionally written as IIII. I think both are valid, but generally 4 is IV .
4Additional Information:-IV or IIII both represent 4 in Roman numerals
4Presumably you mean in Roman numerals?If so, then it is IIII or IV
The numeral for 4 is often written as IIII on clocks although it is generally written as IV, but both are correct.
No, the Roman numeral for 4 is IV, not llll. The use of llll is a common mistake, but traditional Roman numeral representations on clocks and other time-related devices use IV instead of llll for the numeral 4.
4- IV It is not IIII because that the rule of roman numerals is going over three digits; IIII is 4 on clocks but that technically is incorrect hence IIII breaks the rule. 4 is known to be IIII on clocks but technically it is incorrect. The correct answer is IV hence V is 5 and VI is 6.