To balance the numbers of the watch. Instead of seeing "IV" on one side and "VIII" on the other side, "IIII" balances better with "VIII"
IIII (or IV) is a Roman numeral which represents the number 4.
Yes
IV or IIII
Generally the Roman numeral IV represents the number 4 but on some old watches and sun dials 4 is represented by the numeral IIII. The numeral IIII was correct when it was written but convention now decrees that a numeral should not be repeated more than three times. According to this rule IIII should no longer be used.
Yes, IV or IIII
IIII (or IV) is a Roman numeral which represents the number 4.
Yes
IV or IIII
Generally the Roman numeral IV represents the number 4 but on some old watches and sun dials 4 is represented by the numeral IIII. The numeral IIII was correct when it was written but convention now decrees that a numeral should not be repeated more than three times. According to this rule IIII should no longer be used.
4, as a Roman Numeral, should be written as IV, although I have seen it occassionally written as IIII. I think both are valid, but generally 4 is IV .
Yes, IV or IIII
It is IIII but they are both the equivalent of 4
4Additional Information:-IV or IIII both represent 4 in Roman numerals
4Presumably you mean in Roman numerals?If so, then it is IIII or IV
The numeral for 4 is often written as IIII on clocks although it is generally written as IV, but both are correct.
No, the Roman numeral for 4 is IV, not llll. The use of llll is a common mistake, but traditional Roman numeral representations on clocks and other time-related devices use IV instead of llll for the numeral 4.
4- IV It is not IIII because that the rule of roman numerals is going over three digits; IIII is 4 on clocks but that technically is incorrect hence IIII breaks the rule. 4 is known to be IIII on clocks but technically it is incorrect. The correct answer is IV hence V is 5 and VI is 6.