It isn't. The empty set is not a proper subset of the empty set.
The empty set is a subset of every set, for the following reason. "A" is a subset of "B" means that if an item "x" is an element of "A", then it is also an element of "B".
(x is element of A) implies (x is element of B)
Since the empty set has no elements, the left part of the implication is false. Therefore, the entire implication is true. If you have trouble grasping this last part, look up the Wikipedia article, or other sources, for "trivially true" or "vacuous truth". (Briefly, an implication, like "F implies G", can only be false if "F" is true, and "G" is false - in all other cases, it is true.)
Yes,an empty set is the subset of every set. The subset of an empty set is only an empty set itself.
Yes.
The empty set.
Every set contains the empty set. Every set is a subset of itself.
NO
It isn't. The empty set is a subset - but not a proper subset - of the empty set.
An empty set is not a proper subset of an empty set.An empty set is not a proper subset of an empty set.An empty set is not a proper subset of an empty set.An empty set is not a proper subset of an empty set.
yes, if the set being described is empty, we can talk about proper and improper subsets. there are no proper subsets of the empty set. the only subset of the empty set is the empty set itself. to be a proper subset, the subset must be strictly contained. so the empty set is an improper subset of itself, but it is a proper subset of every other set.
Yes,an empty set is the subset of every set. The subset of an empty set is only an empty set itself.
Yes.
The empty set.
Every set contains the empty set. Every set is a subset of itself.
NO
No. The empty is the a subset of every set and every set is a subset of itself.
Yes
The empty set!
No. An empty set is a subset of every set but it is not an element of every set.