In mathematical terms it's called a rhombus.
In India and in Nigeria the year 2012 CE is celebrated and observed as the National Mathematics Year. In India the National Mathematics Year is celebrated as a tribute to the mathematical genius Srinivasa Ramanujan who was born on 22 December 1887 and whose 125th birthday falls on 22 December 2012.[1][2] In Nigeria, the year 2012 is observed as National Mathematics Year as part of the Federal Government's effort to promote and popularise the study of mathematics.[3] [4]
It is actually mathematical TERMS but I'm sure the true answer for that is a rhombus.
Nought
It is called "to evaluate" the expression.
mathematical year
The Prime Minister of India declared 2012 CE as the National Mathematical Year on the 125th anniversary of Shri Ramanujan on 26th February, 2012.
In mathematical terms it's called a rhombus.
A mathematical rule can be called many things including a theory. Proofs can prove this theory to be a rule.
In India and in Nigeria the year 2012 CE is celebrated and observed as the National Mathematics Year. In India the National Mathematics Year is celebrated as a tribute to the mathematical genius Srinivasa Ramanujan who was born on 22 December 1887 and whose 125th birthday falls on 22 December 2012.[1][2] In Nigeria, the year 2012 is observed as National Mathematics Year as part of the Federal Government's effort to promote and popularise the study of mathematics.[3] [4]
Yes, there really will be a year called 2012.But there's no evidence for a dramatic event in 2012.See the Related Question.
Yes, there really will be a year called 2012.But there's no evidence for a dramatic event in 2012.See the Related Question.
American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges was created in 1974.
It is actually mathematical TERMS but I'm sure the true answer for that is a rhombus.
amit garg
The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.The question was asked in 2012. In that case the answer is no, as the year 2012 is 2012 AD. There was no year zero, which may be what is confusing you.
Theorems