Moore's Law states essentially the exponential nature of the curve existing between transistor count in a single chip and passed time in years. Although in most websites and sources, the curve shown is straight with transistor # being in the Y axis, it must be observed, Moore stated that the curve is exponential. Thus the graphs, if linear are logarithmic curves, as a log graph for an exponential curve is linear in nature. So instead of transistor nos (x) , we use ln(x)
it wasn't true
Let us suppose we are plotting y vs x and obtain a straight line. Then we pick a set of two coordinates, x1,y1 and x2,y2 The slope, M, is then given by the equation M (y2-y1)/(x2-x1) If we apply this to a force vs mass graph, we obtain the expression M (F2-F1)/(m2-m1),but F ma according to Newton's second law, where a is the acceleration, which leads to (m2a2-m1a1)/(m2-m1), but if a2 a1 a, as it will if the line is straight, then M a(m2-m1)/(m2-m1) a, so the slope, M, of your graph is acceleration.
"Ohmic" means it obeys Ohm's law (V=IR, i.e., voltage = current x resistance). Since Ohm's law can be understood to be a definition of resistance, what this really means is that the material has a constant resistance. In such a case, the slope of current as a function of voltage will be a straight line passing through the origin.
.the BASIC law of a angle is that a angle must be made by two line ,one line can't make any angle ,a straight angle is make by 2 line not 1 ; you it is only one it is because both line are in the same level . Base or this fact a straight angle is a angle Hope this can solve your question
The intercept of -273¤C on the Charles law graph represents the absolute minimum of temperature below which it is not possible to go -Chukwuma Akubueze
since v is propotional to i it is a straight line
There is no 'point on a graph' which represents Ohm's Law. It's the shape of the graph that determines whether Ohm's Law applies.If a graph is drawn showing the resulting variation in current for changes in voltage then, for Ohm's Law to apply, the graph must be a straight line.If the resulting graph is not a straight line, then Ohm's Law doesn't apply.
A straight line graph verifying Hooke's law for a spiral spring indicates that the relationship between the force applied and the extension of the spring is linear, meaning the spring obeys Hooke's law. This demonstrates that the spring's behavior is proportional to the force applied, confirming the validity of Hooke's law for the spiral spring.
It is the point at which the stress-strain graph of a material deviates from being a straight line. It is the point at which a material stops obeying Hooke's Law
You cannot 'verify' Ohm's Law with a series or parallel circuit. The only way of verifying Ohm's Law is to plot a graph of current against voltage for variations in voltage. If the resulting graph is a straight line, then you have verified Ohm's Law for the load you have used.
Most definitely NOT! For Ohm's Law to apply, the ratio of voltage to current MUST be constant for variations in voltage. And this is only true for a small number of materials we call 'ohmic' or 'linear' materials -meaning that if we plotted a graph of voltage against current for changes in voltage, we'd end up with a straight line (linear) graph. But most materials are 'non-ohmic' or 'non-linear' -in other words, the resulting graph is NOT a straight line. It can be argued that Ohm's Law, therefore, is not a 'law' at all! Perhaps it's time it was scrapped?
it wasn't true
The graph of force versus displacement for an elastic spring is a straight line through the origin due to Hooke's law, which states that the force applied is directly proportional to the displacement of the spring. As the displacement increases, the force required to maintain that displacement also increases linearly.
When you plot a graph of voltage against current, you can end up with a straight line or a curved line.If you have a straight line, then it shows that the change in current is directly proportional to the change in voltage and, so, the circuit is obeying Ohm's Law. If the graph is a curve, then the change in current is not proportional to the change in voltage and, so, the circuit is not obeying Ohm's Law.In the case of a straight-line graph, the gradient of the graph indicates the resistance of the circuit. The greater the gradient, the higher the circuit resistance.In the case of a curved-line graph, the gradient (i.e. the tangent) at each point along that curve will indicate the (changing) resistance at each of those points.
The current is represented by the horizontal (x) axis, and the potential difference is represented by the vertical (y) axis.If the resulting graph is a straight line, then it confirms that the circuit is obeying Ohm's Law. If the resulting graph is a curve, then the circuit does not obey Ohm's Law.The gradient at any point along of the resulting line represents the resistance of the load for that ratio of voltage to current.
Ohm's Law only applies when the ratio of voltage to current is constant for variations in voltage. If you were to plot a graph of current against voltage, and the result is a straight line, then Ohm's Law applies; if the result is a curved line, then Ohm's Law does NOT apply.Ohm's Law is NOT a universal law; in fact, if barely qualifies as a 'law' at all because, in most cases, it does not work!Nichrome alloy is designed to retain a constant resistance over a wide range of temperatures. So it is considered to be 'ohmic' or 'linear' because, when plotting current against voltage, it produces a straight-line graph, for variations in voltage. So, nichrome obeys Ohm's Law.Thermistors and diodes produce curved graph lines and, so, are considered to be 'non-linear' or 'non-ohmic', and do NOT obey Ohm's Law.
fiRSt LAW Of MOtiON