There are usually more zeros in dividends because it is more preferible that the larger number is in the dividends section
Their quotient is positive if the integers have the same sign;negative if the integers have different signs;zero if the dividend is zero (and the divisor is not).
If there is no remainder, you can use the relation:dividend = divisor x quotient If you ONLY know the divisor, you don't have enough information; though you can make up any number for the quotient, and multiply them together to get the dividend.
They are the same. The quotient of the equation: 160/8 = 20 is 20, which has only one zero. The dividend of this equation is 160, which also has only one zero. Therefore they both have the same number of zeros
Quotient 0, remainder 805. Note that you will always get this pattern when you divide a smaller number by a larger one - i.e., the quotient will be zero, and the remainder will be the dividend.
Undefined: You cannot divide by zero
When you're quotient is in the hundredths place or more or when you're dividend or divisor has a placeholder zero as well.
As long as the number is not zero, the quotient remains unchanged. If the multiplier is zero then the quotient is undefined.
Their quotient is positive if the integers have the same sign;negative if the integers have different signs;zero if the dividend is zero (and the divisor is not).
If there is no remainder, you can use the relation:dividend = divisor x quotient If you ONLY know the divisor, you don't have enough information; though you can make up any number for the quotient, and multiply them together to get the dividend.
They are the same. The quotient of the equation: 160/8 = 20 is 20, which has only one zero. The dividend of this equation is 160, which also has only one zero. Therefore they both have the same number of zeros
Quotient 0, remainder 805. Note that you will always get this pattern when you divide a smaller number by a larger one - i.e., the quotient will be zero, and the remainder will be the dividend.
If it's long division then it is because the quotient will become a decimal number after its decimal point
The answer is 0 times with a remainder of 17. When dividing 17 by 19, the divisor is larger than the dividend, so the division cannot be completed evenly. The quotient would be 0, and the remainder would be the original dividend, which is 17 in this case.
Undefined: You cannot divide by zero
The quotient of a division tell you how many times the divisor needs to be subtracted from the dividend to get a result of zero. eg 10 ÷ 2 = 5 tells you that 2 needs to be subtracted 5 times from 10 to get 0: (1) 10 - 2 = 8; (2) 8 - 2 = 6; (3) 6 - 2 = 4; (4) 4 - 2 = 2; (5) 2 - 2 = 0. With a divisor of 1, it can be subtracted exactly the same number of times as the dividend itself to get zero. With a divisor greater than 1, each subtraction removes more than 1 and so less subtractions that the dividend will be required. With a divisor less than 1 (and greater than 0) each subtraction removes less than 1; if it is subtracted the same number of times as the dividend there will be a remainder greater than zero which will require further subtractions before zero is reached. eg 3 ÷ 0.6: (1) 3 - 0.6 = 2.4; (2) 2.4 - 0.6 = 1.8; (3) 1.8 - 0.6 = 1.2 [still have 1.2 to go]; (4) 1.2 - 0.6 = 0.6; (5) 0.6 - 0.6 = 0 → 3 ÷ 0.6 = 5.
You divide.
A quotient is undefined if the divisor is zero.