I believe it is because ultrasound uses sound waves whereas x-rays are a form of ionizing radiation. (Ionizing radiation is radiation with enough energy to remove electrons from their orbit around a nucleus.) However, with today's advances in x-ray protection X-rays are not generally harmful unless in excessive amounts. Medical radiation (for the average individual) accounts for only 11% of the irradiation received over our lifetime. There are tons of consumer products (exit signs and skin lotions, for example) that expose us to radiation. Not to mention the sun... Anyway, my point is that ultrasound is probably safer than X-rays. But it is also important to know that the type of diagnostic information produced by each is different and if your doctor recommends you get an xray, don't insult him by suggesting an ultrasound instead. :)
136 * * * * * Actually there are 17*16 = 272 angles. Assuming the rays do not meet at 180 degrees, each pair of rays forms two angles: one less than 180 deg and one greater.
Assuming none of the rays meet at 180 degrees, each pair of rays gives rise to two angles: one less than 180 deg and one greater. There can, therefore, be a maximum of 30*29 = 870 angles. (There are 435 unique pairs of rays: ab, ac, ad...bc, bd, be, etc.)
Ultrasound is sound which has a frequency higher than that of audible sound.( like radar )ADDED: Not like radar. That uses radio waves, although sonar and radar principles are similar.
Less
No, they are not. X-rays have a higher energy than UV radiation, and they have the potential to do more damage to tissue.
I believe it is because ultrasound uses sound waves whereas x-rays are a form of ionizing radiation. (Ionizing radiation is radiation with enough energy to remove electrons from their orbit around a nucleus.) However, with today's advances in x-ray protection X-rays are not generally harmful unless in excessive amounts. Medical radiation (for the average individual) accounts for only 11% of the irradiation received over our lifetime. There are tons of consumer products (exit signs and skin lotions, for example) that expose us to radiation. Not to mention the sun... Anyway, my point is that ultrasound is probably safer than X-rays. But it is also important to know that the type of diagnostic information produced by each is different and if your doctor recommends you get an xray, don't insult him by suggesting an ultrasound instead. :)
Yes, of course.
Gamma rays are more dangerous than alpha rays because they are electromagnetic radiation that can penetrate deeply into tissues, causing damage at the atomic level whereas alpha rays are less penetrating and can be shielded by something as thin as a piece of paper.
Because of safety of the fetus, and x-rays really only give an idea of bone structure , whilst ultrasound gives us an indication of lung and heartdevelopment. :)
Two reasons. Firstly, Safety. Fetus have a higher rate of cellular division than the average human being. A damaged gene while still developing can cause birth defects. Secondly, X-rays really only give an idea of bone structure and generally aren't live. It X-rays don't give as clear an indication on lung and heart development.
accepted is not less than 7 sqm.
Because the Moon has no atmosphere to filter out dangerous radiation.
X-rays are more dangerous as they have a higher energy than UV radiation. The higher the energy, the more potential for DNA damage.
it does not damage tissues with ionizing radiation. Ultrasound is also generally far better than plain x rays at distinguishing the subtle variations of soft tissue structures, and can be used in any of several modes
There is some discomfort, but less than most patients expect.
Yes, you can complete the ultrasound technician in less than one year. Many technical schools, Junior colleges and Universities offer ultrasound technician training classes for this fast track career that can land you a job in as little as one year.