A census would get data from 100% of the population (or at least close to 100%). Sampling would be to get data from some of the population (much less than 100%).
A census would require data to be collected from 54000000 people.
census is conducted for group data so if it is a sampling data is taken it would lead to lot of non sampling errors
Unreliable
One theory is that the Matthew gospel was written "with an agenda" to make sure that Jesus's story fulfilled all the old testament predictions for the messiah. One example is arranging for Jesus to be born in Bethlehem because of the Roman census (there was a prediction that the messiah would be born in Bethlehem). There was a census around that time, but long after Herod had died (Herod died in 4BC, the census was, ISTR in 7AD). In any case, it's pretty unlikely that people would have to return to their ancestor's birthplace from 1000 years previously for a census; what would be the point?
take a census
There are several places on the Internet that an individual can find information from a 1911 census done in the UK. Examples would include the 1911 census UK official website, Ancestry, and National Archives.
Increasing the sample size would make the data more reliable by reducing the impact of random variations and increasing the statistical power of the study. Additionally, ensuring that the data collection methods are standardized and reproducible would improve the reliability of the results.
Information that you can trust would be termed reliable. If you aren't sure of the source, or the source is someone that you don't trust, then the information would be unreliable, and you wouldn't count on it in an important situation. If the information is reliable, then you might trust it without doing your own research.
Luke's Gospel says that Mary and Joseph had to travel from Nazareth in Galilee to Bethlehem in Judea, and be counted there for the census. However, scholars say that not only was the census at the wrong time for the nativity story in Luke's Gospel, there would never have been a requirement for Mary and Joseph to travel from Galilee where they would be taxed, to Judea where any census record would have no value in ensuring the collection of taxes. They say that the journey from Nazareth to Bethlehem simply did not happen.
the population of LA (los angeles) is 12,536,426 in 2012(this year)... this answer is totally reliable.. you thx XDD That might be the population of LA and all its many suburbs, but the city itself was counted at 3,792,621 in the 2010 census. That's about 2.6% more than in the 2000 census. If we assume the same rate of growth, then the 2012 population would be about 3,893,010. The 2011 estimate for all of Los Angeles County was 9,889,056.
A smaller amount of naphthalene collected could be due to factors such as incomplete combustion, evaporation of naphthalene during collection, loss of product during transfer, or issues with the experimental setup affecting the efficiency of collection. It is important to carefully control these variables to ensure accurate and reliable results in the collection process.
Although a strict Latin plural would be formed as census(as it is a fourth declension, not a second declension which would make it censi), the accepted English plural is censuses.
The census is taken every 10 years, so that would make the next one 2020.
I'm not great at insects, but it might be a Copestylum mexicanum. You might want to try a more reliable source than me. It would help to know where you saw it.
I'm not great at insects, but it might be a Copestylum mexicanum. You might want to try a more reliable source than me. It would help to know where you saw it.
Because of a 72 year rule, the decennial census of 1790 would have been published in 1862.