0
Why practice statement 1966 ought to be used sparingly and only if it right to do so?
Practice Statement 1966 should be used sparingly because it allows courts to depart from precedent, which can undermine the stability and predictability of the law. Frequent use could lead to uncertainty in legal outcomes, making it difficult for individuals and businesses to rely on established legal principles. Additionally, it is essential to ensure that any departure from precedent is justified and serves the interests of justice, rather than simply reflecting changing judicial opinions. Thus, it is crucial to exercise this power judiciously to maintain the integrity of the legal system.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Rafa
Jordan
TaigaAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is how are straight angles different from right angles a statement?
"How are straight angles different from right angles?" Is this a statement?
How do you get to a math statement...let statement?
work it left to right then insert ie
Choose the negation of this statement A is a right angle?
A is not a right angle.
Is this statement true or false A right triangle is also acute.?
False
What does one begin by assuming to prove a statement by contradiction?
To prove a statement by contradiction one begins by assuming the statement is not true. Contradiction is the act of giving the opposing something that you feel is not right.
