answersLogoWhite

0

Practice Statement 1966 should be used sparingly because it allows courts to depart from precedent, which can undermine the stability and predictability of the law. Frequent use could lead to uncertainty in legal outcomes, making it difficult for individuals and businesses to rely on established legal principles. Additionally, it is essential to ensure that any departure from precedent is justified and serves the interests of justice, rather than simply reflecting changing judicial opinions. Thus, it is crucial to exercise this power judiciously to maintain the integrity of the legal system.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

17h ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

RafaRafa
There's no fun in playing it safe. Why not try something a little unhinged?
Chat with Rafa
JordanJordan
Looking for a career mentor? I've seen my fair share of shake-ups.
Chat with Jordan
TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why practice statement 1966 ought to be used sparingly and only if it right to do so?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp