Chat with our AI personalities
1m=3.280839ft so 1700m = 5577.427ft
10% of 17%= 10% * 17%= 0.10 * 17%= 1.7%= 0.017 in decimal
This solution involves imaginary numbers where the identity i2 = -1 is used and thus √-1 = i √-1700 = √(-1 x 1700) √-1 = i and √1700 = √(17 x 100 ) = √(17 x 102) = 10√17...so one way of expressing the answer is 10i√17. However, the square root of a positive number can be either positive or negative so the full answer is, √-1700 = ± 10i√17. Similarly, the solution can be written as, ± 41.231i. (3dp)
Since '1700' would be 100%, we can simply calculate the percentage she spent by dividing what she spent with her monthly income. 125 / 1700 = 0.0735 Now we multiply this number by 100 to get the total percentage she spent. 0.0735 x 100 = 7.35% So, no, she did not spend 8% of her monthly income, she only spent 7.35% Another way you can do this is by calculating how much 1% of her monthly income would be, and then multiplying it by 8 and comparing it to the total amount she spent. Since '1700' would be 100%, then '1700' divided by 100 would equal how much 1% of her monthly income is. 1700/100 = 17 Now, we can multiply that by 8. 17 x 8 = 136 So, $136 is how much 8% of Lindsey's income. Knowing this, and knowing she only spent $125, the answer is No, she did not spend 8% of her $1700 monthly income. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Or multiply 1700 by 8% which is .08 and compare that to 125.
The GCF of two (probably not "to") numbers is 850. So what is the question?