its with numbers
sqrt(2) + sqrt(3) is irrational.
Any irrational number can be approximated by decimals. You can never write it exactly, since there are an infinite number of decimals, and these don't repeat.
Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.
Rational
No. If you can write the number on paper, it's rational. 68 is the ratio of 68 to 1.
yes you are explaining what you are to someone or something
No. If you write an irrational number as a decimal, it will have an infinite number of decimal digits that don't repeat periodically.
write some sentences explaining why you are sending back a faulty item.write complete sentences using joining words conjunctions.for example;and.as but or include
sqrt(2) + sqrt(3) is irrational.
Any irrational number can be approximated by decimals. You can never write it exactly, since there are an infinite number of decimals, and these don't repeat.
Not completely to its end. If you can completely write a number with digits, then it's a rational number.
Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.
write some sentences explaining why you are sending back a faulty item.write complete sentences using joining words conjunctions.for example;and.as but or include
NO it is not irrational, that is to say it IS rational. If you can write a number as ratio of integers, it is rational. -11.7 can certainly be written as a ratio of integers.
Rational
No. Quite simply an irrational number cannot be written as a fraction and you could write zero as a fraction ex. 0/1
5.39 is the ratio of 539 to 100 ... completely rational.Any number that you can completely write down with digits is rational.