In Java, the relevant lines would be something like this:
for (int number = 1; number <= 10; number++)
System.out.println(number, number*number, number*number*number);
No.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theorem
-- Write down a list of the first ten whole numbers. -- For each one, multiply it by itself, and write the product next to it.
A trick for figuring out squares of larger numbers that is sometimes helpful: if you can write the numbers as the product of two different numbers, then you can square those two numbers and multiply that to find the square of the original. 602 = 102*62 = 100*36 = 3600
36 is the square of 6; 100 is the square of 10; 121 is the square of 11. 71, 62, and 343 are not squares of whole numbers.
How can you have 0 as the difference of two squares? 5^2-5^2?
No.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theorem
#include
-- Write down a list of the first ten whole numbers. -- For each one, multiply it by itself, and write the product next to it.
The prince has a lot of prints that he printed (iI don't know I know it's dumb)
The perfect squares from 1 to 10000 are the numbers that result from multiplying an integer by itself. The perfect squares in this range are 1^2, 2^2, 3^2, ..., 100^2. So, the perfect squares in this range are 1, 4, 9, 16, ..., 10000.
Oh, what a lovely question! To compute the sum of the squares of N numbers, you can create a simple algorithm. Start by initializing a variable to hold the sum, then loop through each number, square it, and add it to the sum. Once you've done this for all N numbers, you'll have the sum of their squares. Just like painting a happy little tree, take your time and enjoy the process.
A programmer can write programs in C, but C can't write anything by itself.
The simplest way is probably to read the numbers into an array and then prints each element of the array starting at the last one and moving backwards.
A trick for figuring out squares of larger numbers that is sometimes helpful: if you can write the numbers as the product of two different numbers, then you can square those two numbers and multiply that to find the square of the original. 602 = 102*62 = 100*36 = 3600
You mean the calculators should write the programs? Well, they couldn't.
Ask a local attorney.
36 is the square of 6; 100 is the square of 10; 121 is the square of 11. 71, 62, and 343 are not squares of whole numbers.