(-3,-4)
You just write, "No Solution."
To write a linear equation with the point (-2, 4) as a solution, you can use the point-slope form of a linear equation, which is ( y - y_1 = m(x - x_1) ). Here, ( (x_1, y_1) = (-2, 4) ). You can choose a slope ( m ) (for example, ( m = 1 )) and then substitute the coordinates to get ( y - 4 = 1(x + 2) ). Simplifying this gives the equation ( y = x + 6 ).
you add 1+1= 25 simple ;)
you have to take the bottom denominator and multiply it by the numerator then go bang a bum
It does not. The generalised linear form: ax + by + c = 0 is simpler since that is easily extended to 3 (or more) dimensional space.
You just write, "No Solution."
To write a linear equation with the point (-2, 4) as a solution, you can use the point-slope form of a linear equation, which is ( y - y_1 = m(x - x_1) ). Here, ( (x_1, y_1) = (-2, 4) ). You can choose a slope ( m ) (for example, ( m = 1 )) and then substitute the coordinates to get ( y - 4 = 1(x + 2) ). Simplifying this gives the equation ( y = x + 6 ).
l
Simply write that "no solutions are available for <equation>".
you add 1+1= 25 simple ;)
A Y-intercept and the slope. The y-intercept is where the line crosses the Y axis.
you have to take the bottom denominator and multiply it by the numerator then go bang a bum
write chemical equation for the reaction between viscose solution and sulphuric acid
It does not. The generalised linear form: ax + by + c = 0 is simpler since that is easily extended to 3 (or more) dimensional space.
f(x) = mx +b. m and b are arbitrary constants.
The equation x=c where c is a constant is the equation of a vertical line. It can't be a function but it is linear so the answer is no. For example, the vertical line produced by the linear equation x = 3 does not represent a function. We cannot write this equation so that y is a function of x because the only x-value is 3 and this "maps" to every real-number y.
3(x+4)