No.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theorem
The only perfect squares from 1 to 31 are 1, 4, 9, 16, and 25.All of the other 26 are NOT perfect squares.2,3,5,6,7,8,10,11,12,13,14,15,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,26,27.28,29,30,31
In Algebra, perfect squares are used when one wants to break down a geometrically square object into smaller squares which can be of all different sizes.
All their roots are whole numbers.
It is a rational number - as are ALL perfect squares.
By definition, ALL perfect squares are whole numbers!
No.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theorem
9+16+25= 50
The only squares of perfect squares in that range are 1, 16, and 81.
The only perfect squares from 1 to 31 are 1, 4, 9, 16, and 25.All of the other 26 are NOT perfect squares.2,3,5,6,7,8,10,11,12,13,14,15,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,26,27.28,29,30,31
Yes
Yes.
In Algebra, perfect squares are used when one wants to break down a geometrically square object into smaller squares which can be of all different sizes.
Here is a procedure that would do the job nicely: -- Make a list of all the perfect squares between 5 and 30. (Hint: They are 9, 16, 25, 36, and 49.) -- Find the sum by writing the numbers in a column and adding up the column.
No, 8 is a multiple of 4 and NOT a perfect square.
1,4,9,16,25,36,49,64,81,100
All their roots are whole numbers.