Best Answer

No, 42 and 68 are not relatively prime. They have more than the number 1 as a common factor.

More answers

No, because 1 is not their only common factor. The number 3 is also a common factor.

A single number, such as 2664, cannot be relatively prime.

2842 is a single number which is a composite, not a prime.

No, they are not.

no, because 42 has multiple factors

Yes.

yes

Yes.

No.

Q: Are 42 and 105 relatively prime?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Movies & Television

Yes, 96 and 105 are relatively prime because they have no prime factors in common.

No. To be relatively prime, numbers have to have a GCF of 1. Numbers ending in 5 are divisible by 5.

It is: 630 by finding the prime factors of the given numbers

Any prime number is relatively prime to 7, such as 2, 3, 5, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, ... Because 7 is a prime number, any number that does not have 7 as a factor is relatively prime to 7, such as 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, ...

30, 42, 66, 78, 102, 105, 114, 138 all have exactly three distinct prime factors.

Related questions

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, 42 and 108 are not relatively prime. Two even numbers cannot be relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

No.

no

Yes, 96 and 105 are relatively prime because they have no prime factors in common.

No.

no because it is just not

Eleven numbers less than 105 are relatively prime to 105. They are 82, 83, 86, 88, 89, 92, 94, 97, 101, 103, and 104.

jerks