0
PIERRE DE FERMAT' S LAST THEOREM.
CASE SPECIAL N=3 AND.GENERAL CASE N>2. .
THE CONDITIONS.Z,X,Y,N ARE THE INTEGERS . Z*X*Y*N>0.N>2.
Z^3=/=X^3+Y^3 AND Z^N=/=X^N+Y^N.
SPECIAL CASE N=3.
WE HAVE
(X^2+Y^2)^2=X^4+Y^4+2X^2*Y^2.
BECAUSE
X*Y>0=>2X^2*Y^2>0.
SO
(X^2+Y^2)^2=/=X^4+Y^4.
CASE 1. IF
Z^2=X^2+Y^2
SO
(Z^2)^2=(X^2+Y^2)^2
BECAUSE
(X^+Y^2)^2=/=X^4+Y^4.
SO
(Z^2)^2=/=X^4+Y^4.
SO
Z^4=/=X^4+Y^4.
CASE 2. IF
Z^4=X^4+Y^4
BECAUSE
X^4+Y^4.=/= (X^2+Y^2.)^2
SO
Z^4=/=(X^2+Y^2.)^2
SO
(Z^2)^2=/=(X^2+Y^2.)^2
SO
Z^2=/=X^2+Y^2.
(1) AND (2)=> Z^4+Z^2=/=X^4+Y^4+X^2+Y^2.
SO
2Z^4+2Z^2=/=2X^4+2Y^4+2X^2+Y^2.
SO
(Z^4+Z^2+2Z^3+Z^4+Z^2-2Z^3)=/=(X^4+X^2+2X^3+X^4+X^2-2X^3)+)(Y^4+Y^2+2Y^3+Y^4+Y^2-2Y^3)
SO IF
(Z^4+Z^2+2Z^3)/4=(Z^4+Z^2+2Z^3)/4+(Z^4+Z^2+2Z^3)/4
=> (Z^4+Z^2-2Z^3)/4=/=(Z^4+Z^2-2Z^3)/4+(Z^4+Z^2-2Z^3/4)
AND
SO IF
(Z^4+Z^2-2Z^3)/4=(Z^4+Z^2-2Z^3)/4+(Z^4+Z^2-2Z^3)./4
=> (Z^4+Z^2+2Z^3)/4=/=(Z^4+Z^2+2Z^3)/4+(Z^4+Z^2+2Z^3)/4
BECAUSE
(Z^4+Z^2+2Z^3)/4 - (Z^4+Z^2-2Z^3)/4 =Z^3.
SO
Z^3=/=X^3+Y^3.
GENERAL CASE N>2.
Z^N=/=X^N+Y^N.
WE HAVE
[X^(N-1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2]^(N+1)/(N-1)=X^(N+1)/2+Y^(N+1)/2+ H.
BECAUSE X*Y>0=>H>0.
SO
[X^(N-1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2]^(N+1)/(N-1)=/= X^(N+1)/2+Y^(N+1)/2
CASE 1. IF
Z^(N-1)/2=X^(N-1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2
SO
[Z^(N-1)/2]^(N+1)/(N-1)=[X^(N-1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2 ]^(N+1)/(N-1).
BECAUSE
[X^(N-1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2 ]^(N+1)/(N-1)=/=X^(N+1)/2+Y(N+1)/2.
SO
[Z^(N-1)/2]^(N+1)/(N-1)=/=X^(N+1)/2+Y(N+1)/2.
SO
Z^(N+1)/2=/=X^(N+1)/2+Y^(N+1)/2.
CASE 2. IF
Z^(N+1)/2=X^(N+1)/2+Y^(N+1)/2
SO
[Z^(N+1)/2]^(N-1)/(N+1)=[X^(N+1)/2+Y^(N+1)/2 ]^(N-1)/(N+1)
BECAUSE
[X^(N+1)/2+Y^(N+1)/2](N-1)/(N+1)=/=X(N-1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2.
SO
[Z^(N+1)/2]^(N-1)/(N+1)=/=X(N-1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2.
SO
Z^(N-1)/2=/=X(N-1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2..
SO
(1) AND (2)=> Z^(N+1)/2+Z^(N-1)/2=/=X^(N+1)/2+Y^(N+1)/2+X^(N-1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2.
SO
2[Z^(N+1)/2+Z^(N-1)/2]=/=2[X^(N+1)/2+Y^(N+1)/2]+2[X^(N-1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2.]
SO
[Z^(N+1)/2+Z^(N-1)/2+2Z^N ]+[Z^(N+1)/2+Z^(N-1)/2-2Z^N ]=/=[X^(N+1)/2+X^(N-1)/2+2X^N ]+[X^(N+1)/2+X^(N-1)/2-2X^N ]+[Y^(N+1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2+2Y^N ]+[Y^(N+1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2-2Y^N ]
SO IF
[Z^(N+1)/2+Z^(N-1)/2+2Z^N ]/4=[X^(N+1)/2+X^(N-1)/2+2X^N ] /4+ [Y^(N+1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2+2Y^N ]/4=>
[Z^(N+1)/2+Z^(N-1)/2-2Z^N ]/4=/=[X^(N+1)/2+X^(N-1)/2-2X^N ] /4+ [Y^(N+1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2-2Y^N ]/4
AND
IF
[Z^(N+1)/2+Z^(N-1)/2-2Z^N ]/4=[X^(N+1)/2+X^(N-1)/2-2X^N ] /4+ [Y^(N+1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2-2Y^N ]/4
=>
[Z^(N+1)/2+Z^(N-1)/2+2Z^N ]/4=/=[X^(N+1)/2+X^(N-1)/2+2X^N ]/4 + [Y^(N+1)/2+Y^(N-1)/2+2Y^N ]/4
BECAUSE
[Z^(N+1)/2+Z^(N-1)/2+2Z^N ] /4- [Z^(N+1)/2+Z^(N-1)/2-2Z^N ]/4=Z^N.
SO
Z^N=/=X^N+Y^N
HAPPY&PEACE.
Trantancuong.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is a thereom?
theorem always needs proof
What is the proof for theorem 1.20?
There is no theorem with the standard name "1.20". This is probably a non-standard name from a textbook which is either the 20th theorem in the first chapter or a theorem of the 20th section of the first chapter.
Proof for the midpoint theorem 7.5?
The midpoint theorem says the following: In any triangle the segment joining the midpoints of the 2 sides of the triangle will be parallel to the third side and equal to half of it
Where did Fermat write his last theorem?
He didn't write it. What he did was to write in the margin of a book that he had a proof but there was not enough space to write it there.
State and prove stokes theorem?
You can find an introduction to Stokes' Theorem in the corresponding Wikipedia article - as well as a short explanation that makes it seem reasonable. Perhaps you can find a proof under the links at the bottom of the Wikipedia article ("Further reading").
Did anyone oppose to the pythgreom theorm?
Although the Pythagorean theorem (sums of square of a right angled triangle) is called a theorem it has many mathematical proofs (including the recent proof of Fermats last theorem which tangentially also prooves Pythagorean theorem). In fact Pythagorean theorem is an 'axiom', a kind of 'super law'. It doesn't matter if anyone does oppose it, it is one of the few fundamental truths of the universe.
Why wasn't Fermats last theorem written on paper?
But it was. That is why we know about it. If you mean why the PROOF was not written- Fermat wrote that he had found a wonderful proof for the theorem, but unfortunately the margin was too small to contain it. This is why the theorem became so famous- being understandable by even a schoolchild, but at the same time so hard to prove that even the best mathematicians had to surrender, with a simple proof seemingly being existent that just nobody except Fermat could find. The theorem has since been proven but the proof uses math tools that are very advanced and were not available in Fermat's life-time.
Parts of formal proof of theorem?
Parts of formal proof of theorem?
Can a corollary be solved with a theorem?
No. A corollary goes a little bit further than a theorem and, while most of the proof is based on the theorem, the extra bit needs additional proof.
Proof of bpt theorem?
Theory_of_BPT_theorem
How does postulate becomes a theorem.?
When a postulate has been proven it becomes a theorem.
Which of these is the definition of a corollary?
a theorem that follows directly from another theorem or postulate, with little of no proof
What is proven with a geometric proof?
Theorems is what is proven with the geometric proof.
What is a thereom?
theorem always needs proof
How do you do the indirect proof of ptolemy theorem?
o.o
What is the subject of a direct geometric proof?
theorem
Did da vinci have a proof for the pythagorean theorem?
A visual proof of the Pythagorean theorem, claimed to have been devised by the great genius of the Renaissance, Leonardo da Vinci.
