CK(J) = {x Є K: jx = xj for all j Є J}.
Also, using the established theorem that "if J is a subset of ring K, then C(J) is a subring of K, and if an invertible element a of K belongs to C(J), then k-1 Є C(J)," we need only show that if g Є C* (C* being the set of non-zero elements of C), then g is an automorphism of E. Assuming non-triviality, g � 0, and there exists
b Є E such that g(b) � 0. For each h Є E there exists m Є K such that m(g(b)) = y since K is primitive. Thus: g(m(b)) = m(g(b)) = y, showing that g is surjective.
Finally to show g is also injective and thus an automorphism, we take a non-zero element w belonging to the kernel of g. For each z Є E some endomorphism would exist u Є K such that u(w) = z as K is primitive. Therefore:
g(z) = g(u(w)) = u(g(w)) = u(0) = 0, the zero endomorphism which is a contradiction. Hence g is injective and an automorphism of E.
Q.E.D.
Chat with our AI personalities
pumping lemma states that any string in such a language of at least a certain length (called the pumping length), contains a section that can be removed, or repeated any number of times, with the resulting string remaining in that language.
Given Positive Integers a and b there exists unique integers q and r satisfying a=bq+r; 0 lesser than or equal to r<b
Prove that if it were true then there must be a contradiction.
You cannot prove that because it's false
You need to prove he's the father if you're seeking monetary compensation.