answersLogoWhite

0

Schur's theorem:Let (J,+) be an abelian group with more than one element, and let K be a primitive ring with endomorphisms, E. Then the centralizer, C, of K, in the ring ξ(E), which is defined as the set of all endomorphisms of (J,+), is a subdivision of ξ(E). Proof:First off, it needs to be stated that C is a non-zero set because it contains the identity function, I, which obviously fits the definition of a centralizer:

CK(J) = {x Є K: jx = xj for all j Є J}.

Also, using the established theorem that "if J is a subset of ring K, then C(J) is a subring of K, and if an invertible element a of K belongs to C(J), then k-1 Є C(J)," we need only show that if g Є C* (C* being the set of non-zero elements of C), then g is an automorphism of E. Assuming non-triviality, g � 0, and there exists

b Є E such that g(b) � 0. For each h Є E there exists m Є K such that m(g(b)) = y since K is primitive. Thus: g(m(b)) = m(g(b)) = y, showing that g is surjective.

Finally to show g is also injective and thus an automorphism, we take a non-zero element w belonging to the kernel of g. For each z Є E some endomorphism would exist u Є K such that u(w) = z as K is primitive. Therefore:

g(z) = g(u(w)) = u(g(w)) = u(0) = 0, the zero endomorphism which is a contradiction. Hence g is injective and an automorphism of E.

Q.E.D.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Movies & Television

How do I prove Pratt's lemma?

Pratt's lemma can be proved using the concept of tree decompositions and the properties of binary trees. The lemma states that any binary tree can be represented as a unique sequence of nested parenthetical expressions. To prove this, one can construct a recursive algorithm that generates the expression for each node based on its position in the tree, ensuring that the parentheses correctly reflect the tree structure. By demonstrating that the recursive structure consistently produces valid and unique representations for the sequences, the lemma is established.


What is pumping lemma?

pumping lemma states that any string in such a language of at least a certain length (called the pumping length), contains a section that can be removed, or repeated any number of times, with the resulting string remaining in that language.


Where is the birth place of aklilu lemma?

Aklilu Lemma was born in the town of Bonga, located in the Kaffa Zone of the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region of Ethiopia. He is known for his significant contributions to Ethiopian history and politics. Bonga is also notable for its rich cultural heritage and coffee cultivation, reflecting Ethiopia's historical ties to coffee production.


What is Euclid's division lemma?

Given Positive Integers a and b there exists unique integers q and r satisfying a=bq+r; 0 lesser than or equal to r<b


How do you prove a conjecture is false?

Prove that if it were true then there must be a contradiction.

Related Questions

What is a lemma's size?

A lemma is a proven statement used as a tool to prove another statement. There is no restriction on its size.


What is the difference between hypothesis and lemma?

A Hypothesis is something that you set out to test to prove or disprove. A Lemma is something that has already been proved that you use to help prove something else.


How can you use the pumping lemma to prove that a language is not regular?

To use the pumping lemma to prove that a language is not regular, you would assume the language is regular and then show that there is a string in the language that cannot be "pumped" according to the lemma's conditions. This contradiction would indicate that the language is not regular.


Application of gronwall's lemma in differential equations?

Used to prove uniqueness of solutions in ODE problems


How do you prove Fatou's Lemma?

The well-written proof can be found in the Wikipedia article, which can be located in a link below.


Difference between a theorem and lemma?

Theorem: A mathematical statement that is proved using rigorous mathematical reasoning. In a mathematical paper, the term theorem is often reserved for the most important results. Lemma: A minor result whose sole purpose is to help in proving a theorem. It is a stepping stone on the path to prove a theorem. The distinction is rather arbitrary since one mathematician's major is another's minor claim. Very occasionally lemmas can take on a life of their own (Zorn's lemma, Urysohn's lemma, Burnside's lemma, Sperner's lemma).


Can you use the pumping lemma to prove that a language is not regular?

Yes, the pumping lemma is a tool used in formal language theory to prove that a language is not regular. It involves showing that for any regular language, there exists a string that can be "pumped" to generate additional strings that are not in the language, thus demonstrating that the language is not regular.


The next lemma is an analog of the previous lemma?

This usually means the upcoming lemma is an adaption of a previous lemma to a mathematical object related to the one in the first lemma.


What is the plural of ''lemma''?

The plural of "lemma" is "lemmas" or "lemmata".


How can the keyword "pumping lemma" be used to prove that a language is regular?

The keyword "pumping lemma" can be used to prove that a language is regular by showing that any sufficiently long string in the language can be divided into parts that can be repeated or "pumped" to create more strings in the language. If this property holds true for a language, it indicates that the language is regular.


What is an example of a Lemma?

An example of a lemma in mathematics is the triangle inequality, which states that the sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the length of the third side. Lemmas are used as stepping stones to prove more complex theorems.


How can the pumping lemma be used to prove that a language is not context-free?

The pumping lemma is a tool used in formal language theory to show that a language is not context-free. It works by demonstrating that certain strings in the language cannot be broken down into smaller parts in a way that satisfies the rules of a context-free grammar. If a language fails the conditions of the pumping lemma, it is not context-free.