It can be. 29 is a factor of 58.
The only factors of 29 are ' 1 ' and ' 29 '.The only factor it has in common with 62, and therefore their greatest common factor, is ' 1 '.
Since 4 x 7 is 28, you know that 7 isn't a factor of 29. Since 29 is a prime number, you know that 7 isn't a factor of it. To be perfectly sure, divide 7 into 29. If the answer is an integer, it's a factor.
The O'Reilly Factor - 1996 - 2013-10-29 was released on: USA: 29 October 2013
The O'Reilly Factor - 1996 2012-03-29 was released on: USA: 29 March 2012
Both 23 and 29 are prime; their only factors are 1 and themselves. Therefore, the greatest common factor is 1.
The factor pairs of 29 are 1 and 29. 29 is prime so it has only one factor pair.
Since 29 is a factor of 116, the GCF of 29 and 116 is 29.
By comparing it to its multiples. 29 is a factor of 58.
GCF of 29 and 58 is 29The GCF is 29.
29 is a prime number. The only factors it has are ' 1 ' and 29.Since 29 is not a factor of 95, the only factor they share is ' 1 '.
Since the number 29 is prime, the greatest common factor of 15 and 29 is 1.
It's not necessary for two reasons. First, 29 is a factor of 87 so it will automatically be the GCF of this problem. Second, since factor trees are designed to find prime numbers and 29 is already prime, it doesn't have a tree. But if you insist... 87 3,29 Here we have a factor tree, more like a factor shrub, that shows that the prime factors of 87 are 3 and 29. Since 29 is a factor of 29, the GCF is 29.
29
The only factors of 29 are ' 1 ' and ' 29 '.The only factor it has in common with 62, and therefore their greatest common factor, is ' 1 '.
The factor tree of 29 would consist of only the number 29 itself, as it is a prime number. Prime numbers have only two factors: 1 and the number itself. Therefore, the factor tree for 29 would simply show 29 at the top with no further branches or factors.
1 and 29 because 29 is a prime number
No.