No. But 870 is divisible by 3 (because 8+7+0 = 15 -> 1 + 5 = 6 and 6 is divisible by 3). 870/3 = 290.
A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible both by 2 and 3 1240 is even then is divisible by 2 1+2+4+0 = 7 which is not divisible by 3 then 1240 is not divisible by 3 Thus 1240 is not divisible by 6
There is no such number.
Using the tests for divisibility:Divisible by 3:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 3, so is the original number: 6 + 8 + 4 = 18 which is divisible by 3, so 684 is divisible by 3Divisible by 6:Number is divisible by 2 and 3: Divisible by 2:If the number is even (last digit divisible by 2), then the whole number is divisible by 2. 684 is even so 684 is divisible by 2.Divisible by 3:Already shown above to be divisible by 3. 684 is divisible by both 2 & 3 so 684 is divisible by 6Divisible by 9:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 9, so is the original number: 6 + 8 + 4 = 18 which is divisible by 9, so 684 is divisible by 9Thus 684 is divisible by all 3, 6 & 9.
42 is divisible by 2 and 6.
870 can be divisible by 2, 3, 5, 6, and 10
yes it is divisible by 2 3 and 6
No. But 870 is divisible by 3 (because 8+7+0 = 15 -> 1 + 5 = 6 and 6 is divisible by 3). 870/3 = 290.
870 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 15, 29, 30, 58, 87, 145, 174, 290, 435 and 870. 870, 1740, 2610 and so on are divisible by 870.
No.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 15, 29, 30, 58, 87, 145, 174, 290, 435, 870.
870 ÷ 6 = 145
No
No. 483 is not divisible by 6.A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by both 2 and 3.It is divisible by 2 if it is even and it is divisible by 3 if the sum of the digits is a multiple of 3.483 is not divisible by 6 since it is not divisible by 2 although it is divisible by 3.
If it is divisible by 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6.
if a number is divisible by 2 and 3 then its divisible by 6
If a number is divisible by 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6.