Oh, dude, like, totally not. 67 is not a multiple of 4. It's like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole - just doesn't work, man. So, yeah, 67 and 4 are, like, not on the same wavelength at all.
Just one: 72.
The LCM of 67 and 134 is 134.
6499
A multiple has to be equal to or larger than the number itself, so there are no multiples for 359 that are between 67 and 113. 359 is a prime number, so it has no factors between 67 and 113 either.
80.
4,5,6
Assuming you want a number that is a multiple of all of 4, 6, 9: It is a multiple of their lowest common multiple. lcm(4, 6, 9) = 36 So you require a multiple of 36 between 67 and 113: 67 ÷ 36 = 1 r 31 → 1st multiple of 36 > 67 is 2 x 36 = 72 113 ÷ 36= 3 r 5 → last multiple of 36 < 113 is 3 x 36 = 108 → both 78 and 108 are numbers between 67 and 113 which are multiples of all of 4, 6 & 9. If not, re-ask being more specific in your requirements.
If you mean lowest common multiple of 67, it's 67!
There is no digit that can replace the ? in 2?67 to make it divisible by 4. All multiples of 4 are even, 2?67 is an odd number and so cannot be a multiple of 4.
72, 108
The numbers between 67 and 113 that are multiples of 2, 4, and 5 are 80 and 100.
80 and 100
72, 96
72, 96
72 or 108
80, 96, 112
72, 108